Atlantic yacht & ship Inc. V. Sovereign yachts (Canada) Inc.
The in rem aspect was struck out because Atlantic's claim is a personal contractual claim against the builder lacking the requisite statutory nexus to the vessel under s22(2)(a) or s22(2)(n); no proceeds of sale had been paid into court under s43(2); there was no contractual involvement by the owner/buyer to ground in rem jurisdiction, therefore the Federal Court lacked jurisdiction to proceed in rem and the arrest was void ab initio.
- Citation
- 2003 FC 965
- Parties
- Plaintiff Broker: Atlantic Yacht & Ship Inc.; Defendant Shipbuilder: Sovereign Yachts (Canada) Inc.; Defendant Res/ship: The Owners And All Others Interested In The Ship "Status Quo" also known as Sovereign Hull Number SYCC9162001; Mortgagee and Buyer; Applicant Seeking Release of Arrest (movant): Don Davis
- Court
- Federal Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 8 August 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Maritime / Admiralty (in Rem and in Personam) / Interlocutory Motion to Strike Out in Rem Claim and to Release Vessel From Arrest
- Outcome
- In rem claim dismissed; warrant of arrest void ab initio; vessel released from arrest; action to proceed without in rem aspect (in personam claims unaffected)
- Legal Topics
- In Rem Jurisdiction, Ship Arrest, Brokerage Commission Dispute, Beneficial Ownership, Statutory Interpretation of Federal Court Act S22(2) and S43(2)
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Atlantic Yacht & Ship Inc.
Plaintiff Broker
Sovereign Yachts (Canada) Inc.
Defendant Shipbuilder
The Owners And All Others Interested In The Ship "Status Quo" also known as Sovereign Hull Number SYCC9162001
Defendant Res/ship
Don Davis
Mortgagee and Buyer; Applicant Seeking Release of Arrest (movant)
Procedural Posture
Maritime / Admiralty (in Rem and in Personam) / Interlocutory Motion to Strike Out in Rem Claim and to Release Vessel From Arrest
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Federal Court has in rem jurisdiction to enforce a broker's contractual claim against a vessel
- 2 Whether a broker who contracted with a builder can arrest the buyer's beneficially owned vessel
- 3 Whether Atlantic's claim falls within s22(2)(a) (title/ownership/proceeds) or s22(2)(n) (contract relating to construction) of the Federal Court Act
Ratio Decidendi
The in rem aspect was struck out because Atlantic's claim is a personal contractual claim against the builder lacking the requisite statutory nexus to the vessel under s22(2)(a) or s22(2)(n); no proceeds of sale had been paid into court under s43(2); there was no contractual involvement by the owner/buyer to ground in rem jurisdiction, therefore the Federal Court lacked jurisdiction to proceed in rem and the arrest was void ab initio.
Court Disposition
In rem claim dismissed; warrant of arrest void ab initio; vessel released from arrest; action to proceed without in rem aspect (in personam claims unaffected)
Orders
- In rem aspect of the Statement of Claim struck out
- Warrant of arrest declared void ab initio
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment