Ottawa Agricultural Ins. Co. v. Sheridan

Ottawa Agricultural Ins. Co. v. Sheridan

The Court affirmed that Thomson possessed an insurable interest in the immovables at the time of application and that the company, through its agents, accepted an assignment intended to cover Sheridan's interest for $1,510, entitling Sheridan to recover $1,510; however Sheridan had no insurable interest in the movables, so the assignment could not vest rights in him as to movables and those claims fail.

Citation
(1880) 5 SCR 157
Parties
Appellant/defendant: Ottawa Agricultural Insurance Company; Respondent/plaintiff: Thomas Sheridan; Original Insured/transferor: Thomas Thomson
Court
Supreme Court of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
10 April 1880
Procedural Posture
Insurance Dispute (fire Policy) Assignment and Insurable Interest / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Court of Queen's Bench for Lower Canada (appeal Side)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; judgment of the Court of Queen's Bench for Lower Canada (appeal side) affirmed
Legal Topics
Insurable Interest, Transfer/assignment of Policy, Misrepresentation/warranty in Application, Agency Authority and Estoppel, Distinction Between Immovables and Movables
Source Language
English
Insurance Property Contract Agency/estoppel Insurable Interest Transfer/assignment of Policy Misrepresentation/warranty in Application Agency Authority and Estoppel +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ottawa Agricultural Insurance Company

Appellant/defendant

Thomas Sheridan

Respondent/plaintiff

Thomas Thomson

Original Insured/transferor

Procedural Posture

Insurance Dispute (fire Policy) Assignment and Insurable Interest / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Court of Queen's Bench for Lower Canada (appeal Side)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether misrepresentations in Thomson's application/warranty voided the policy
  2. 2 Whether Thomson had an insurable interest in the immovables at the time of the application
  3. 3 Whether the transfer/assignment to Sheridan was valid and for what amount

Ratio Decidendi

The Court affirmed that Thomson possessed an insurable interest in the immovables at the time of application and that the company, through its agents, accepted an assignment intended to cover Sheridan's interest for $1,510, entitling Sheridan to recover $1,510; however Sheridan had no insurable interest in the movables, so the assignment could not vest rights in him as to movables and those claims fail.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; judgment of the Court of Queen's Bench for Lower Canada (appeal side) affirmed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs
  • Judgment of Court of Queen's Bench affirmed