Standard Reliance Mortgage Corporation v. Stubbs
The covenant in the mortgage stating the principal ($700) and the rate of interest (10% per annum) satisfied s.6 of the Interest Act because the statutory information (amount advanced and annual rate computed yearly and not in advance) was present in the deed; form is immaterial and therefore the mortgagee may...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- (1917) 55 SCR 422
- Parties
- Appellant (defendant): Standard Reliance Mortgage Corporation; Respondent (plaintiff): Lewis St. George Stubbs
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 22 June 1917
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Mortgage Interest/statutory Interpretation (interest Act R.s.c. 1906 C.120) / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada; Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; action dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Interest Act R.s.c. 1906 C.120, Mortgage Blended Payments, Statement of Principal and Interest, Calculation of Interest
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Standard Reliance Mortgage Corporation
Appellant (defendant)
Lewis St. George Stubbs
Respondent (plaintiff)
Procedural Posture
Appeal Mortgage Interest/statutory Interpretation (interest Act R.s.c. 1906 C.120) / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada; Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a mortgage covenant stating the principal and an annual rate satisfies s.6 of the Interest Act where payments are blended
- 2 Whether the statute requires a detailed numerical breakdown showing how each instalment allocates between principal and interest
- 3 Legal effect under s.7 if the prescribed statement is absent or inconsistent
Ratio Decidendi
The covenant in the mortgage stating the principal ($700) and the rate of interest (10% per annum) satisfied s.6 of the Interest Act because the statutory information (amount advanced and annual rate computed yearly and not in advance) was present in the deed; form is immaterial and therefore the mortgagee may recover interest; appeal allowed and action dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; action dismissed.
Orders
- Appeal allowed and action dismissed.
- Costs to appellants in this Court and the courts below to be paid by the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment