MB8-13444
Even if the appellant's factual allegations were accepted, she failed to prove on a balance of probabilities that she would face persecution, torture, or cruel and unusual treatment in Cap-Haitien; no evidence shows her attackers remain interested or have means to find her after nine years, so an internal flight alternative exists and the RPD decision is confirmed.
- Citation
- MB8-13444
- Parties
- Appellant / Person Who Is the Subject of the Appeal: XXXX XXXX; Respondent / Minister: Minister of Citizenship and Immigration
- Court
- Refugee Appeal Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 11 July 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Appeal (refugee Appeal Division) / Appeal Decision (rad)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; RPD determination confirmed
- Legal Topics
- Internal Flight Alternative, Credibility Assessment, Persecution, Gender Based Persecution, Exclusion (article 1 E), Burden of Proof, State Protection
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX
Appellant / Person Who Is the Subject of the Appeal
Minister of Citizenship and Immigration
Respondent / Minister
Procedural Posture
Refugee Appeal (refugee Appeal Division) / Appeal Decision (rad)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant is credible
- 2 Whether there is an internal flight alternative (IFA) in Cap-Haitien
- 3 Whether the appellant faces a forward-looking risk of persecution under ss.96 and 97 IRPA
Ratio Decidendi
Even if the appellant's factual allegations were accepted, she failed to prove on a balance of probabilities that she would face persecution, torture, or cruel and unusual treatment in Cap-Haitien; no evidence shows her attackers remain interested or have means to find her after nine years, so an internal flight alternative exists and the RPD decision is confirmed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; RPD determination confirmed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
- RPD determination dated May 8, 2018 confirmed: appellant is not a Convention refugee or a person in need of protection within the meaning of ss.96 and 97 of the IRPA.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment