Beacon Hill Park Trust (Re)
The Crown Grant (Right of Entry) creating the Beacon Hill Park Trust is a conveyance/instrument to be interpreted as a contractual grant under the principles in Sattva; applying those principles to the Trust wording 'for the use, recreation and enjoyment of the public' the court concluded that 'use' must be read as limited to activities of recreation and enjoyment consistent with the park's nature and character and does not include permitting temporary sheltering or encampments by persons experiencing homelessness; therefore the Trust does not permit such sheltering.
- Citation
- 2022 BCSC 284
- Parties
- Petitioner / Trustee: Corporation of the City of Victoria; Settlor / Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen in Right of British Columbia; Respondent / Guardian of Public Interest: Attorney General of British Columbia; Respondent / Interested Public Group: Friends of Beacon Hill Park Society; Respondents / Individuals Sheltering in the Park: Shea Smith and Dennis Davies; Respondent / Public Advocacy Group: Together Against Poverty Society
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Reference Under Trustee Act S.86 / Reasons for Judgment (in Chambers)
- Outcome
- Answer to petition: No — Beacon Hill Park, as held under the 1882 Trust, may not be used by persons experiencing homelessness for temporary sheltering; the Trust must be interpreted as a contractual conveyance and read to preserve the park's nature for recreation and enjoyment.
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Trust Instruments, Public Park Trusts, Sheltering by Persons Experiencing Homelessness, Trustee Act S.86 References, Costs (public Interest)
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Corporation of the City of Victoria
Petitioner / Trustee
Her Majesty the Queen in Right of British Columbia
Settlor / Respondent
Attorney General of British Columbia
Respondent / Guardian of Public Interest
Friends of Beacon Hill Park Society
Respondent / Interested Public Group
Shea Smith and Dennis Davies
Respondents / Individuals Sheltering in the Park
Together Against Poverty Society
Respondent / Public Advocacy Group
Procedural Posture
Reference Under Trustee Act S.86 / Reasons for Judgment (in Chambers)
Legal Issues
- 1 Is the Beacon Hill Park Trust a statutory enactment or a contractual conveyance?
- 2 What principles govern interpretation of the Trust (statutory or contractual)?
- 3 Is the Trust wording ambiguous such that testamentary trust rules apply?
Ratio Decidendi
The Crown Grant (Right of Entry) creating the Beacon Hill Park Trust is a conveyance/instrument to be interpreted as a contractual grant under the principles in Sattva; applying those principles to the Trust wording 'for the use, recreation and enjoyment of the public' the court concluded that 'use' must be read as limited to activities of recreation and enjoyment consistent with the park's nature and character and does not include permitting temporary sheltering or encampments by persons experiencing homelessness; therefore the Trust does not permit such sheltering.
Court Disposition
Answer to petition: No — Beacon Hill Park, as held under the 1882 Trust, may not be used by persons experiencing homelessness for temporary sheltering; the Trust must be interpreted as a contractual conveyance and read to preserve the park's nature for recreation and enjoyment.
Orders
- Court answers the s.86 reference: Trust does not permit temporary sheltering in Beacon Hill Park.
- All parties shall bear their own costs; public interest special costs denied.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment