Keewatin v. Ontario (Natural Resources)
The chambers judge approved the proposed draft order including para.7 because it corresponded with the Court of Appeal's usual practice regarding intervener costs and there were no submissions to justify a different order.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2012 ONCA 891
- Parties
- Plaintiffs (respondents): Andrew Keewatin Jr. and Joseph William Fobister on their own behalf and on behalf of all other members of Grassy Narrows First Nation; Defendant (appellant): Minister of Natural Resources; Defendant (appellant): Resolute FP Canada Inc. (formerly Abitibi-Consolidated Inc.); Third Party (appellant): The Attorney General of Canada; Intervener: Goldcorp Inc.; Intervener: Ermineskin First Nation et al; Intervener: Grand Council Treaty 3; Intervener: Wabauskang First Nation and Big Grassy First Nation; Intervener: Lac Seul First Nation
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Court of Appeal (in Chambers) Interlocutory (intervener Status)
- Outcome
- The chambers judge approved the draft order submitted by Mr. Janes including para.7 stating interveners are not entitled to costs nor liable for costs.
- Legal Topics
- Intervener Status, Costs Order, Intervener Costs Immunity, Court of Appeal Procedure
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Andrew Keewatin Jr. and Joseph William Fobister on their own behalf and on behalf of all other members of Grassy Narrows First Nation
Plaintiffs (respondents)
Minister of Natural Resources
Defendant (appellant)
Resolute FP Canada Inc. (formerly Abitibi-Consolidated Inc.)
Defendant (appellant)
The Attorney General of Canada
Third Party (appellant)
Goldcorp Inc.
Intervener
Ermineskin First Nation et al
Intervener
Grand Council Treaty 3
Intervener
Wabauskang First Nation and Big Grassy First Nation
Intervener
Lac Seul First Nation
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Civil / Court of Appeal (in Chambers) Interlocutory (intervener Status)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the draft order regarding intervener status should be approved
- 2 Whether interveners should be entitled to costs or liable for costs of the appeals
Ratio Decidendi
The chambers judge approved the proposed draft order including para.7 because it corresponded with the Court of Appeal's usual practice regarding intervener costs and there were no submissions to justify a different order.
Court Disposition
The chambers judge approved the draft order submitted by Mr. Janes including para.7 stating interveners are not entitled to costs nor liable for costs.
Orders
- The draft order submitted by Mr. Janes is approved.
- Paragraph 7 of the approved order: the intervener parties and intervener friends of the court shall not be entitled to seek costs or be liable for costs of the appeals.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment