Fenotti Estate (Re)
The forfeiture rule (public policy) applies to intestacy: a person who murdered the intestate (Richard Glen Shields) is not entitled to inherit under the Estate Administration Act; question answered in the negative, relying on Nordstrom v. Baumann and consistent BC authority.
- Citation
- 2014 BCSC 1533
- Parties
- Petitioner/administrator: David Lynn Griffiths; Deceased: Ethel Sarah Fenotti; Beneficiary: Susan Diana Fenotti; Beneficiary: Jerome Emilio Fenotti; Beneficiary: Wade Tyler Fenotti; Respondent/beneficiary/accused: Richard Glen Shields
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 13 August 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Estate Administration Petition for Directions / Application for Directions Under Trustee Act and Estate Administration Act (petition Hearing)
- Outcome
- Answered question one: Richard Glen Shields is not entitled to a share of the estate. Question two adjourned for further evidence and submissions regarding the Deed and Wade's capacity.
- Legal Topics
- Intestacy, Forfeiture Rule, Administration of Estates, Court Directions, Capacity of Beneficiary, Stay of Effect
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Lynn Griffiths
Petitioner/administrator
Ethel Sarah Fenotti
Deceased
Susan Diana Fenotti
Beneficiary
Jerome Emilio Fenotti
Beneficiary
Wade Tyler Fenotti
Beneficiary
Richard Glen Shields
Respondent/beneficiary/accused
Procedural Posture
Estate Administration Petition for Directions / Application for Directions Under Trustee Act and Estate Administration Act (petition Hearing)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a person who murdered the intestate (Richard Glen Shields) is entitled to inherit under the Estate Administration Act/intestacy rules
- 2 Whether the administrator can release the funds held in trust for the murderer's share to the other beneficiaries given the terms of the Deed and potential capacity issues of Wade Tyler Fenotti
Ratio Decidendi
The forfeiture rule (public policy) applies to intestacy: a person who murdered the intestate (Richard Glen Shields) is not entitled to inherit under the Estate Administration Act; question answered in the negative, relying on Nordstrom v. Baumann and consistent BC authority.
Court Disposition
Answered question one: Richard Glen Shields is not entitled to a share of the estate. Question two adjourned for further evidence and submissions regarding the Deed and Wade's capacity.
Orders
- Adjourn consideration of whether the funds held in trust may be released until counsel provides further evidence and submissions regarding Wade's capacity and potential involvement of the Public Guardian and Trustee
- Order that a copy of these reasons be personally served on Richard Glen Shields by the petitioner or his agent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment