Canada (National Revenue) v. 9183-4507 Québec Inc
The Court found the Minister fulfilled the duty of frank and full disclosure, the evidence established the 2007 transactions were artificial tax planning producing an apparent capital loss and the related companies were alter egos used to defeat tax obligations; the applicants failed to show reasonable grounds that collection would not be jeopardized by delay; lifting the corporate veil and issuing a final garnishment order was justified; the appeal of the prothonotary was moot due to waiver and was dismissed.
- Citation
- 2015 FC 901
- Parties
- Applicant/minister: Her Majesty the Queen (Minister of National Revenue); Respondent/debtor: 9183-4507 Québec Inc.; Third Party: 9183-4564 Québec Inc.; Garnishee: Company Trust Royal; Garnishee: RBC Philips Hager and North Services-Conseils et Placements Inc.; Garnishee: Gestion Placements Desjardins
- Court
- Federal Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Income Tax Jeopardy Collection and Garnishment Review; Appeal Under Federal Courts Rules / Motions Heard and Judgment on Review of Jeopardy Collection and Garnishment Orders (final Disposition)
- Outcome
- Applicants' motions dismissed; final order of garnishment granted; costs awarded jointly and severally against 9183-4507 Québec Inc. and 9183-4564 Québec Inc.
- Legal Topics
- Jeopardy Collection, Garnishment, Lifting Corporate Veil, General Anti Avoidance Rule (gaar), Frank and Full Disclosure, Affidavit Substitution
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen (Minister of National Revenue)
Applicant/minister
9183-4507 Québec Inc.
Respondent/debtor
9183-4564 Québec Inc.
Third Party
Company Trust Royal
Garnishee
RBC Philips Hager and North Services-Conseils et Placements Inc.
Garnishee
Gestion Placements Desjardins
Garnishee
Procedural Posture
Income Tax Jeopardy Collection and Garnishment Review; Appeal Under Federal Courts Rules / Motions Heard and Judgment on Review of Jeopardy Collection and Garnishment Orders (final Disposition)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Minister fulfilled the duty of frank and full disclosure in the ex parte jeopardy collection application
- 2 Whether delay in payment would jeopardize collection of assessed tax debt
- 3 Whether corporate veils of related companies should be lifted to permit garnishment
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found the Minister fulfilled the duty of frank and full disclosure, the evidence established the 2007 transactions were artificial tax planning producing an apparent capital loss and the related companies were alter egos used to defeat tax obligations; the applicants failed to show reasonable grounds that collection would not be jeopardized by delay; lifting the corporate veil and issuing a final garnishment order was justified; the appeal of the prothonotary was moot due to waiver and was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Applicants' motions dismissed; final order of garnishment granted; costs awarded jointly and severally against 9183-4507 Québec Inc. and 9183-4564 Québec Inc.
Orders
- 9183-4507 Québec Inc.'s motion to review the jeopardy collection order of December 16, 2013 is dismissed
- 9183-4564 Québec Inc.'s motion challenging garnishment orders of December 19, 2013 is dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment