Lavigne c. Canada (Procureur général)

Lavigne c. Canada (Procureur général)

Given the PCRE Act definition of income and the administrative record, the CRA's decision was supported by a coherent, rational analysis that considered the amended tax return but reasonably concluded the amendment was made to obtain benefits and that overall evidence did not meet statutory thresholds; procedural fairness was respected and new evidence not before the decision maker is inadmissible on review.

Citation
2023 CF 1182
Parties
Applicant / Demanderesse: Karolyne Lavigne; Respondent / Défendeur: Procureur général du Canada
Court
Federal Court
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
31 August 2023
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review of Administrative Decision (canada Revenue Agency Decision on PCRE Eligibility) / Final Judgment on Application for Judicial Review
Outcome
Application for judicial review dismissed
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Reasonableness Standard (vavilov), Procedural Fairness, Eligibility Criteria for Canada Emergency Response/pcre, Income Calculation and Depreciation/amortization
Source Language
French
Administrative Law Social Benefits / Government Assistance Tax Law Judicial Review Reasonableness Standard (vavilov) Procedural Fairness Eligibility Criteria for Canada Emergency Response/pcre Income Calculation and Depreciation/amortization

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Karolyne Lavigne

Applicant / Demanderesse

Procureur général du Canada

Respondent / Défendeur

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review of Administrative Decision (canada Revenue Agency Decision on PCRE Eligibility) / Final Judgment on Application for Judicial Review

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the CRA's decision denying PCRE was unreasonable
  2. 2 Whether the CRA properly calculated applicant's net self‑employment income for eligibility
  3. 3 Whether procedural fairness was breached by the CRA

Ratio Decidendi

Given the PCRE Act definition of income and the administrative record, the CRA's decision was supported by a coherent, rational analysis that considered the amended tax return but reasonably concluded the amendment was made to obtain benefits and that overall evidence did not meet statutory thresholds; procedural fairness was respected and new evidence not before the decision maker is inadmissible on review.

Court Disposition

Application for judicial review dismissed

Orders

  • The application for judicial review is dismissed.
  • No costs are awarded.