Citadel Assurance v. Johns-Manville Canada

Citadel Assurance v. Johns-Manville Canada

Because the appellant (a compensated surety) received actual notice and suffered no prejudice and because the bond did not require exhaustion of statutory mechanics' lien remedies, the court held that trivial non‑compliance with notice formalities does not discharge a compensated surety and the claimant may sue on the bond without first exhausting lien remedies.

Citation
[1983] 1 SCR 513
Parties
Appellant (defendant/surety): Citadel General Assurance Company; Respondent (plaintiff/material Supplier): Johns-Manville Canada Inc.; Plaintiff (obligee/trustee): Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Ontario as Represented by the Ministry of the Environment; Defendant (principal/contractor): John Carlo Limited
Court
Supreme Court of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
17 May 1983
Procedural Posture
Collection / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Ontario Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Labour and Material Payment Bond, Notice Requirements for Bond Claims, Mechanics' Lien Act S.11 Hold Back, Compensated Vs Accommodation Surety, Exhaustion of Remedies
Source Language
English
Insurance Suretyship Construction Law Property Security/mechanics' Lien Labour and Material Payment Bond Notice Requirements for Bond Claims Mechanics' Lien Act S.11 Hold Back Compensated Vs Accommodation Surety +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 21 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Citadel General Assurance Company

Appellant (defendant/surety)

Johns-Manville Canada Inc.

Respondent (plaintiff/material Supplier)

Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Ontario as Represented by the Ministry of the Environment

Plaintiff (obligee/trustee)

John Carlo Limited

Defendant (principal/contractor)

Procedural Posture

Collection / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Ontario Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether strict compliance with the bond's notice provisions is a prerequisite to suing on the bond
  2. 2 Whether a claimant must exhaust mechanics' lien remedies and credit any recovery (hold-back) before suing the surety under the bond
  3. 3 Whether compensated (professional) sureties should be strictly discharged for trivial deviations as accommodation sureties are

Ratio Decidendi

Because the appellant (a compensated surety) received actual notice and suffered no prejudice and because the bond did not require exhaustion of statutory mechanics' lien remedies, the court held that trivial non‑compliance with notice formalities does not discharge a compensated surety and the claimant may sue on the bond without first exhausting lien remedies.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs
  • Judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal and the trial judgment in favour of Johns-Manville Canada Inc. affirmed