Toneguzzo-Norvell (Guardian ad litem of) v. Burnaby Hospital
The Court restored deference to the trial judge on factual assessments of life expectancy because the trial judge's weighing of expert testimony and the statistical study was within his province and not shown to be a palpable or overriding error; however, the Court upheld a 50% deduction for personal living expenses from the award for lost earning capacity in the 'lost years' to avoid duplication and overcompensation.
- Citation
- [1994] 1 SCR 114
- Parties
- Appellant / Plaintiff: Jessica Teresa Toneguzzo‑Norvell (infant) by Rosetta Carmela Toneguzzo, guardian ad litem; Guardian Ad Litem / Plaintiff: Rosetta Carmela Toneguzzo; Respondent / Defendant (physician): Nelson Savein; Respondent / Defendant (hospital): Burnaby Hospital
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 27 January 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Torts Personal Injury (medical Negligence) / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From British Columbia Court of Appeal Concerning Assessment of Damages (life Expectancy and Future Income Loss)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part: trial judge's finding on life expectancy restored (22.5 years from date of trial); Court of Appeal's 50% deduction for personal living expenses in the lost years upheld; otherwise leave to the courts below for assessment of costs.
- Legal Topics
- Life Expectancy, Future Income Loss, Deduction for Personal Living Expenses, Standard of Appellate Review, Weight of Expert and Statistical Evidence
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jessica Teresa Toneguzzo‑Norvell (infant) by Rosetta Carmela Toneguzzo, guardian ad litem
Appellant / Plaintiff
Rosetta Carmela Toneguzzo
Guardian Ad Litem / Plaintiff
Nelson Savein
Respondent / Defendant (physician)
Burnaby Hospital
Respondent / Defendant (hospital)
Procedural Posture
Torts Personal Injury (medical Negligence) / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From British Columbia Court of Appeal Concerning Assessment of Damages (life Expectancy and Future Income Loss)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court of Appeal properly substituted its own assessment of life expectancy for that of the trial judge
- 2 Whether the trial judge erred in using female earning tables and in failing to account adequately for loss of marriage benefits
- 3 Whether a deduction for personal living expenses should be made from awards for lost earning capacity during the 'lost years' (years after projected death)
Ratio Decidendi
The Court restored deference to the trial judge on factual assessments of life expectancy because the trial judge's weighing of expert testimony and the statistical study was within his province and not shown to be a palpable or overriding error; however, the Court upheld a 50% deduction for personal living expenses from the award for lost earning capacity in the 'lost years' to avoid duplication and overcompensation.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part: trial judge's finding on life expectancy restored (22.5 years from date of trial); Court of Appeal's 50% deduction for personal living expenses in the lost years upheld; otherwise leave to the courts below for assessment of costs.
Orders
- Restore trial judge's life expectancy finding of 22.5 years from date of trial
- Affirm deduction of 50% for personal living expenses from award for lost earning capacity during the 'lost years'
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment