Robertson v. Grand Trunk Railway Co. of Canada
The special contract's general wording "shall in no case be responsible" covers loss however caused including loss by negligence; s.246(3) prohibits contractual exemption from liability for negligence but does not preclude a carrier from entering a special contract that limits the monetary amount recoverable for loss — therefore plaintiff's recovery is limited to the agreed $100.
- Citation
- (1895) 24 SCR 611
- Parties
- Appellant / Plaintiff: George D. Robertson; Respondent / Defendant: The Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 26 June 1895
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (tort/negligence; Carriage of Goods) / On Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Limitation of Liability, Special Contract, Carrier's Liability, Tariff Approval, Exemption Clauses
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
George D. Robertson
Appellant / Plaintiff
The Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada
Respondent / Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (tort/negligence; Carriage of Goods) / On Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Appeal for Ontario
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a special contract limiting monetary liability covers loss caused by negligence of the carrier's servants
- 2 Whether s.246(3) of the Railway Act, 1888 prevents a railway company from limiting the amount of damages recoverable for loss caused by negligence
- 3 Whether the clause "shall in no case be responsible" is sufficiently comprehensive to cover loss however caused
Ratio Decidendi
The special contract's general wording "shall in no case be responsible" covers loss however caused including loss by negligence; s.246(3) prohibits contractual exemption from liability for negligence but does not preclude a carrier from entering a special contract that limits the monetary amount recoverable for loss — therefore plaintiff's recovery is limited to the agreed $100.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario affirmed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment