Canadian National Ry. Co. v. Harris
The Live Stock Special Contract and incorporated Classification do not relieve the carrier of liability for this kind of deliberate mutilation absent proof that the loss was caused by an excepted peril or by the shipper's failure to provide an attendant that actually caused or contributed to the loss; the carrier, having invoked contractual exceptions, bore the onus to establish the cause and failed to do so, so the delivery in mutilated condition constituted breach and respondent recovered damages.
- Citation
- [1946] SCR 352
- Parties
- Appellant / Defendant: Canadian National Railway Company; Respondent / Plaintiff: Joseph Harris
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 1946
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal — Carrier Liability Under Special Live Stock Contract / Supreme Court of Canada on Appeal From Court of King's Bench, Appeal Side, Province of Quebec
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; judgment for respondent (Harris) affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Live Stock Special Contract, Carrier's Risk Vs Owner's Risk, Burden of Proof, Construction of Approved Tariff/classification, Common Carrier Liability, Attendant Obligation
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Canadian National Railway Company
Appellant / Defendant
Joseph Harris
Respondent / Plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal — Carrier Liability Under Special Live Stock Contract / Supreme Court of Canada on Appeal From Court of King's Bench, Appeal Side, Province of Quebec
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether carrier liable for mutilation (tails cut) of horses in transit
- 2 Construction and effect of Live Stock Special Contract and incorporated Classification/Tariff
- 3 Whether shipment carried at "owner's risk" absolves carrier of liability for damage including negligence
Ratio Decidendi
The Live Stock Special Contract and incorporated Classification do not relieve the carrier of liability for this kind of deliberate mutilation absent proof that the loss was caused by an excepted peril or by the shipper's failure to provide an attendant that actually caused or contributed to the loss; the carrier, having invoked contractual exceptions, bore the onus to establish the cause and failed to do so, so the delivery in mutilated condition constituted breach and respondent recovered damages.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; judgment for respondent (Harris) affirmed
Orders
- Respondent awarded damages in amount of $200
- Appeal dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment