Crawford v. Bank of Montreal

The appeal was dismissed because the loan documentation and the appellant’s admissions established there was no genuine issue for trial as to the Bank of Montreal, making summary disposition appropriate and supporting the dismissal below.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: 2009 ONCA 98
Parties: Defendant (appellant): Anthony Crawford also known as Tony Crawford; Respondent (plaintiff): Bank of Montreal; Plaintiff by Counterclaim (appellant): Anthony Crawford also known as Tony Crawford; Defendant by Counterclaim (respondent): Bank of Montreal; Defendant by Counterclaim (respondent): Avalon Securities Corp.; Defendant by Counterclaim (respondent): Michael Perris; Defendant by Counterclaim (respondent): Mikary Investments Ltd.; Defendant by Counterclaim (respondent): Gordon E. Glenn; Defendant by Counterclaim (respondent): John M. Graydon; Defendant by Counterclaim (respondent): William Wright; Defendant by Counterclaim (respondent): Donald Ivey; Defendant by Counterclaim (respondent): Robert Pell; Defendant by Counterclaim (respondent): Douglas Ferguson
Court: Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction: Canada
Judgment Date: 2 February 2009
Procedural Posture: Civil Appeal / Appeal From Superior Court Order
Outcome: Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics: Loan Documentation, Summary Judgment, Failure to Read Contract, Genuine Issue for Trial
Source Language: english

Contract Civil Procedure Banking and Finance Loan Documentation Summary Judgment Failure to Read Contract Genuine Issue for Trial

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Anthony Crawford also known as Tony Crawford

Defendant (appellant)

Bank of Montreal

Respondent (plaintiff)

Anthony Crawford also known as Tony Crawford

Plaintiff by Counterclaim (appellant)

Bank of Montreal