Brettingen v. Evans and McKay
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the findings that the plaintiffs owned the chattels and were entitled to damages for wrongful taking and unjust detention and for malicious prosecution because the prosecution lacked reasonable and probable cause and malice was established.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1930] SCR 121
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Brettingen; Defendant/appellant: Evans and McKay
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 8 October 1929
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal Concerning Malicious Prosecution and Conversion / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada (oral Judgment)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Malicious Prosecution, Reasonable and Probable Cause, Malice, Ownership of Chattels, Damages for Wrongful Detention, Appeal Procedure
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brettingen
Plaintiff/respondent
Evans and McKay
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal Concerning Malicious Prosecution and Conversion / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada (oral Judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was want of reasonable and probable cause for prosecution
- 2 Whether the defendant acted with malice
- 3 Ownership of disputed chattels
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the findings that the plaintiffs owned the chattels and were entitled to damages for wrongful taking and unjust detention and for malicious prosecution because the prosecution lacked reasonable and probable cause and malice was established.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Alberta affirmed as to ownership of chattels and awards of damages for wrongful taking, unjust detention and malicious prosecution.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment