Brody v. The Dominion Life Assurance Co.

Brody v. The Dominion Life Assurance Co.

Where the jury’s findings that the insured lacked knowledge of his ill health were perverse on the evidence, and where the appellate court has the statutory/rules power and all relevant facts before it such that further evidence (impossible here because the insured was deceased) would not change the result, the appellate court may substitute its own findings and order rescission of the insurance policies with repayment of premiums.

Citation
[1928] SCR 582
Parties
Defendant / Appellant (substituted Beneficiary): Hannah Brody; Plaintiff / Respondent: The Dominion Life Assurance Company; Original Defendant (deceased, Insured): Hyman Brody
Court
Supreme Court of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
2 October 1928
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal: Insurance Contract Rescission for Alleged Fraudulent Misrepresentation / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From Supreme Court of Nova Scotia En Banc Decision Affirming Rescission of Policies
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs; judgment of Supreme Court of Nova Scotia en banc affirmed
Legal Topics
Misrepresentation, Fraud, Rescission of Contract, Jury Findings, Appellate Fact‑finding, Rules of Court Interpretation
Source Language
English
Insurance Civil Procedure Appeal Misrepresentation Fraud Rescission of Contract Jury Findings Appellate Fact‑finding +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hannah Brody

Defendant / Appellant (substituted Beneficiary)

The Dominion Life Assurance Company

Plaintiff / Respondent

Hyman Brody

Original Defendant (deceased, Insured)

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal: Insurance Contract Rescission for Alleged Fraudulent Misrepresentation / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From Supreme Court of Nova Scotia En Banc Decision Affirming Rescission of Policies

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether insured knew of his ill health when he signed each insurance application such that the representations were fraudulent
  2. 2 Whether the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia en banc had jurisdiction to substitute its own findings of fact for those of the jury where the jury’s findings were perverse
  3. 3 Whether further evidence could be adduced on a new trial that would alter the result

Ratio Decidendi

Where the jury’s findings that the insured lacked knowledge of his ill health were perverse on the evidence, and where the appellate court has the statutory/rules power and all relevant facts before it such that further evidence (impossible here because the insured was deceased) would not change the result, the appellate court may substitute its own findings and order rescission of the insurance policies with repayment of premiums.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs; judgment of Supreme Court of Nova Scotia en banc affirmed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs
  • Cross‑appeal dismissed