In The Matter of John Horvath
The trust deeds were rescinded because the settlor acted under a fundamental mistake as to their legal effect (he did not intend to alienate ownership or control); the deeds were inexpertly drafted by a notary, the settlor had limited English and relied on incorrect advice, the trusts were voluntary with no...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2000 BCSC 117
- Parties
- Applicant / Settlor: John Horvath; Guardian Ad Litem for Infant Beneficiaries: Guardian ad litem; Beneficiaries (infants, Ages 10 and 9): Children (two daughters); Drafter of Trust Deeds (respondent by Implication): Notary Public; Public Trustee (notified): Public Trustee
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 20 January 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Revoke/inter Vivos Trust for Mistake / Application Heard and Judgment Given (rescision Granted)
- Outcome
- Application granted; trust agreements rescinded and declared void; corpus of trust to be returned to settlor
- Legal Topics
- Mistake, Rescission, Voluntary Settlement, Inherent Jurisdiction, Guardian Ad Litem/public Trustee Involvement
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Horvath
Applicant / Settlor
Guardian ad litem
Guardian Ad Litem for Infant Beneficiaries
Children (two daughters)
Beneficiaries (infants, Ages 10 and 9)
Notary Public
Drafter of Trust Deeds (respondent by Implication)
Public Trustee
Public Trustee (notified)
Procedural Posture
Application to Revoke/inter Vivos Trust for Mistake / Application Heard and Judgment Given (rescision Granted)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trust agreements could be revoked for fundamental mistake as to their legal effect
- 2 Whether the settlor intended to divest himself of ownership and control
- 3 Whether equity permits rescission of a voluntary trust made without consideration
Ratio Decidendi
The trust deeds were rescinded because the settlor acted under a fundamental mistake as to their legal effect (he did not intend to alienate ownership or control); the deeds were inexpertly drafted by a notary, the settlor had limited English and relied on incorrect advice, the trusts were voluntary with no consideration, and equity supports rescission in these circumstances.
Court Disposition
Application granted; trust agreements rescinded and declared void; corpus of trust to be returned to settlor
Orders
- Trust agreements rescinded and declared void
- Property comprising the corpus of the trusts to be transferred back to the petitioner (mechanics to be dealt with by counsel)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment