Halbert v. Netherlands Investment Co. of Canada

Halbert v. Netherlands Investment Co. of Canada

The Appeal is dismissed: s.34(f) of the Judicature Act Amendment Act 1942 does not apply to actions authorized by a Debt Adjustment Board permit; the action was validly commenced by permit and later cancellation did not negate that authorization; the order nisi finally disposed of the parties' rights and was a final order unappealed so the subsequent vesting order was valid; any failure to apply the Amendment Act was an error of law (not jurisdictional) and, given the binding Appellate Division precedent at the time, did not invalidate the orders.

Citation
[1945] SCR 329
Parties
Defendants/appellants: Robert Halbert and Another; Plaintiff/respondent: Netherlands Investment Company of Canada Limited
Court
Supreme Court of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
23 March 1945
Procedural Posture
Foreclosure (mortgage) / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Alberta Appellate Division
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Mortgage Foreclosure, Judicature Act Amendment Act 1942 Interpretation, Debt Adjustment Board Permits, Order Nisi Vs Vesting Order, Redemption Period
Source Language
English
Property Civil Procedure Statutory Interpretation Administrative Law Contract Mortgage Foreclosure Judicature Act Amendment Act 1942 Interpretation Debt Adjustment Board Permits +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robert Halbert and Another

Defendants/appellants

Netherlands Investment Company of Canada Limited

Plaintiff/respondent

Procedural Posture

Foreclosure (mortgage) / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Alberta Appellate Division

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether s.34(f) of the Judicature Act Amendment Act, 1942 applied to actions authorized by a permit of the Debt Adjustment Board
  2. 2 Whether cancellation of the permit after commencement treated the action as never authorized
  3. 3 Whether the order nisi was interlocutory or final for appeal purposes under Rule 609

Ratio Decidendi

The Appeal is dismissed: s.34(f) of the Judicature Act Amendment Act 1942 does not apply to actions authorized by a Debt Adjustment Board permit; the action was validly commenced by permit and later cancellation did not negate that authorization; the order nisi finally disposed of the parties' rights and was a final order unappealed so the subsequent vesting order was valid; any failure to apply the Amendment Act was an error of law (not jurisdictional) and, given the binding Appellate Division precedent at the time, did not invalidate the orders.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Appellate Division judgment affirmed
  • Final vesting order upheld and property vested in respondent