Cornwall (Town) v. Derochie

Cornwall (Town) v. Derochie

The appeal was dismissed because there was admissible evidence that the sidewalk was defective (improper construction or subsidence from age/use) allowing water to accumulate and freeze; that defect, not weather alone, caused the dangerous icy condition and thereby constituted a breach of the municipality's statutory duty to keep the street in repair, making the corporation liable for the plaintiff's injuries.

Citation
(1895) 24 SCR 301
Parties
Defendant/appellant: Corporation of the Town of Cornwall; Plaintiff/respondent: Annie Derochie
Court
Supreme Court of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
11 March 1895
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / On Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Appeal for Ontario
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; judgment for respondent (plaintiff) affirmed
Legal Topics
Municipal Liability, Duty to Repair Streets, Sidewalk Defects, Ice and Snow Hazards
Source Language
English
Municipal Law Negligence Tort Law Municipal Liability Duty to Repair Streets Sidewalk Defects Ice and Snow Hazards

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Corporation of the Town of Cornwall

Defendant/appellant

Annie Derochie

Plaintiff/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / On Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Appeal for Ontario

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a municipal corporation is liable for injury caused by ice formed on a sidewalk when the ice results from water accumulation due to a defective sidewalk
  2. 2 Whether weather alone (thaw followed by sudden frost) absolves a municipality of liability for icy conditions
  3. 3 Whether allowing ice to form and remain breaches statutory duty to keep streets in repair

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because there was admissible evidence that the sidewalk was defective (improper construction or subsidence from age/use) allowing water to accumulate and freeze; that defect, not weather alone, caused the dangerous icy condition and thereby constituted a breach of the municipality's statutory duty to keep the street in repair, making the corporation liable for the plaintiff's injuries.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; judgment for respondent (plaintiff) affirmed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs
  • Judgment of the court below in favour of the plaintiff affirmed