R. v. Lewis

R. v. Lewis

The Crown failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused committed an unlawful act that was the only reasonable cause of death; significant circumstantial gaps and credible alternative, logically based inferences (including accidental injury compounded by arrested hydrocephalus, possible fall/near-drowning, and limitations in pathology) create a reasonable doubt requiring acquittal.

Citation
2021 BCSC 1739
Parties
Crown: Regina (The Crown); Accused: Kerryann Sharmila Dawnette Lewis
Court
Supreme Court of British Columbia
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
3 September 2021
Procedural Posture
Criminal Murder (homicide) / Trial Judgment (oral Reasons)
Outcome
Not guilty (acquittal)
Legal Topics
Murder (first/second Degree), Specific Intent, Intoxication Defence, Circumstantial Evidence, Expert Evidence Admissibility, Causation, Post Mortem Redistribution, After the Fact Conduct
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Homicide Evidence Forensic Pathology Toxicology Murder (first/second Degree) Specific Intent Intoxication Defence +5 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 18 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina (The Crown)

Crown

Kerryann Sharmila Dawnette Lewis

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal Murder (homicide) / Trial Judgment (oral Reasons)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Did the accused commit an unlawful act (assault by submersion/drowning)?
  2. 2 Was the Crown's circumstantial case sufficient to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt?
  3. 3 Did intoxication or mental state negate specific intent for murder?

Ratio Decidendi

The Crown failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused committed an unlawful act that was the only reasonable cause of death; significant circumstantial gaps and credible alternative, logically based inferences (including accidental injury compounded by arrested hydrocephalus, possible fall/near-drowning, and limitations in pathology) create a reasonable doubt requiring acquittal.

Court Disposition

Not guilty (acquittal)

Orders

  • Accused found not guilty