Dominion Grange Mutual Fire Insurance Association v. Bradt
The provisional receipt and accompanying documents formed a binding four‑year insurance contract subject to statutory standing conditions in R.S.O. 1887 c.167; the clause treating non‑receipt of a policy within fifty days as incontrovertible evidence of rejection was an ineffective variation of the statutory...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- (1895) 25 SCR 154
- Parties
- Appellant / Defendant: Dominion Grange Mutual Fire Insurance Association; Respondent / Plaintiff: Francis J. Bradt (executrix of Benjamin Barnes)
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 9 December 1895
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Court of Appeal (insurance Contract) / Supreme Court of Canada Decision on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; decision of Court of Appeal for Ontario affirmed; new trial ordered
- Legal Topics
- Mutual Insurance, Termination of Contract, Statutory Conditions, Notice Requirements, Variation of Standard Conditions, Waiver, Estoppel
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dominion Grange Mutual Fire Insurance Association
Appellant / Defendant
Francis J. Bradt (executrix of Benjamin Barnes)
Respondent / Plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Court of Appeal (insurance Contract) / Supreme Court of Canada Decision on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the provisional receipt created a binding four‑year insurance contract or only a 50‑day interim engagement
- 2 Whether the Ontario Insurance Act (R.S.O. 1887 c.167) standing conditions applied to the provisional contract
- 3 Whether the clause treating non‑receipt of a policy within fifty days as incontrovertible evidence of rejection validly varied the statutory conditions
Ratio Decidendi
The provisional receipt and accompanying documents formed a binding four‑year insurance contract subject to statutory standing conditions in R.S.O. 1887 c.167; the clause treating non‑receipt of a policy within fifty days as incontrovertible evidence of rejection was an ineffective variation of the statutory termination rule (and inconsistent with the notice timing requirement) and the insurer’s demand for and receipt of payment provided evidence of waiver/estoppel warranting a fact finding by a jury; accordingly the Court of Appeal’s order for a new trial was affirmed and the appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; decision of Court of Appeal for Ontario affirmed; new trial ordered
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- New trial ordered
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment