Trans-Canada Forest Products v. Heaps, Waterous Limited and Lipsett Engine & Mfg. Co.
The fire was caused by a short circuit from defective insulation of battery cables; the mechanic was negligent in making only a casual inspection and failing to ensure the cables remained separated when testing the repaired engine; the mechanics were servants of Lipsett (the general employer) and Lipsett is therefore liable in tort and must indemnify Heaps; Heaps is liable to Trans-Canada for breach of its repair contract; Trans-Canada was not contributorily negligent; damages are reduced to reflect proper valuation (including value of purchase option).
- Citation
- [1954] SCR 240
- Parties
- Appellant (lessee and Plaintiff): Trans-Canada Forest Products Limited; Appellant (owner and Plaintiff): Ada Flora Hoff, Executrix of Chris Bergvin Hoff, Deceased; Respondent (local Distributor; Defendant; Contractor): Heaps, Waterous Limited; Respondent (general Distributor; Employer of Mechanics; Defendant; Third Party Defendant): Lipsett Engine & Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 4 January 1954
- Procedural Posture
- Tort (negligence) and Contract (repair Contract); Third Party Indemnity / Final Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada (judgment on Appeal)
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed (majority); trial judge's judgment restored subject to variation of damages
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Res Ipsa Loquitur, Master and Servant / Control Test, Indemnity Between Contractors, Contributory Negligence, Assessment of Damages for Lost Option
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Trans-Canada Forest Products Limited
Appellant (lessee and Plaintiff)
Ada Flora Hoff, Executrix of Chris Bergvin Hoff, Deceased
Appellant (owner and Plaintiff)
Heaps, Waterous Limited
Respondent (local Distributor; Defendant; Contractor)
Lipsett Engine & Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
Respondent (general Distributor; Employer of Mechanics; Defendant; Third Party Defendant)
Procedural Posture
Tort (negligence) and Contract (repair Contract); Third Party Indemnity / Final Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada (judgment on Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the mechanic (Martin) was negligent in testing the repaired engine and handling the battery cables
- 2 Whether the repairmen were servants of Lipsett or of Heaps at the time of the fire
- 3 Whether Heaps breached its contract with Trans-Canada by negligent performance of repairs
Ratio Decidendi
The fire was caused by a short circuit from defective insulation of battery cables; the mechanic was negligent in making only a casual inspection and failing to ensure the cables remained separated when testing the repaired engine; the mechanics were servants of Lipsett (the general employer) and Lipsett is therefore liable in tort and must indemnify Heaps; Heaps is liable to Trans-Canada for breach of its repair contract; Trans-Canada was not contributorily negligent; damages are reduced to reflect proper valuation (including value of purchase option).
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed (majority); trial judge's judgment restored subject to variation of damages
Orders
- Appeals by Trans-Canada and Hoff allowed
- Trial judge's judgments restored but award to Trans-Canada varied: previous figure of 125,653.79 deleted and substituted with 89,653.79
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment