Isert v. Santos
Appeal allowed in part: awards for loss of entitlement to claim business expenses (past and future) were unsupported by evidence and must be set aside; discretionary bonuses should not be included in computing impairment of future earning capacity absent evidence of entitlement, and the award for future earning...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 1999 BCCA 42
- Parties
- Plaintiff (respondent): Lynn Isert; Defendant (appellant): Ma Rojwena Garcia Santos; Defendant (appellant): Virgilio Rabe Jr.
- Court
- British Columbia Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 26 January 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Personal Injury (motor Vehicle) / Appeal to Court of Appeal (judgment)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part (majority): items for loss of entitlement to claim business expenses set aside; impairment of future earning capacity and non-pecuniary damages reduced.
- Legal Topics
- Non Pecuniary Damages, Future Earning Capacity, Loss of Discretionary Bonus, Deductibility of Business Expenses, Causation, Evidence and Proof
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lynn Isert
Plaintiff (respondent)
Ma Rojwena Garcia Santos
Defendant (appellant)
Virgilio Rabe Jr.
Defendant (appellant)
Procedural Posture
Civil Personal Injury (motor Vehicle) / Appeal to Court of Appeal (judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether awards for loss of entitlement to claim business expenses as tax deductions (past and future) were supported by evidence
- 2 Whether discretionary bonuses should be included in calculating impairment of future earning capacity
- 3 Whether non-pecuniary damages of $60,000 were excessive given findings of functional impairment
Ratio Decidendi
Appeal allowed in part: awards for loss of entitlement to claim business expenses (past and future) were unsupported by evidence and must be set aside; discretionary bonuses should not be included in computing impairment of future earning capacity absent evidence of entitlement, and the award for future earning capacity and non-pecuniary damages were excessive and properly reduced to $40,000 each (majority judgment).
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part (majority): items for loss of entitlement to claim business expenses set aside; impairment of future earning capacity and non-pecuniary damages reduced.
Orders
- Set aside awards for loss of entitlement to claim business expenses (items 3 and 5)
- Reduce award for impairment of future earning capacity (item 4) to $40,000.00
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment