Tingley v. Wellington Insurance

Tingley v. Wellington Insurance

Applying the non‑suit prima facie test, the court concluded plaintiffs failed to adduce sufficient evidence on the standard of care applicable to an insurance adjuster and on causation linking any toxic chemical at harmful levels to the plaintiffs' health complaints, so claims in negligence and contract (including...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2009 NSSC 248
Parties
Plaintiffs: Patricia Tingley, Margaret Burton, Kelli Smith and Todd Smith; Defendants: Wellington Insurance and Larry Hay
Court
Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
13 July 2009
Procedural Posture
Civil Insurance / Tort / Contract / Non‑suit Motion at Close of Plaintiff's Case (trial)
Outcome
Non‑suit motion granted in part and dismissed in part: negligence and contract causes of action non‑suited (except negligent misstatement based on alleged 'house was safe' statement); fiduciary duty claim dismissed; negligent misstatement and equitable fraud claims remain.
Legal Topics
Non Suit, Standard of Care for Insurance Adjuster, Causation, Negligent Misstatement (hedley Byrne), Bad Faith, Equitable Fraud, Fiduciary Duty, Punitive Damages
Source Language
english
Insurance Tort Contract Civil Procedure Evidence Fiduciary Duty Negligence Non Suit +6 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 24 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Patricia Tingley, Margaret Burton, Kelli Smith and Todd Smith

Plaintiffs

Wellington Insurance and Larry Hay

Defendants

Procedural Posture

Civil Insurance / Tort / Contract / Non‑suit Motion at Close of Plaintiff's Case (trial)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether plaintiffs established a prima facie case on negligence and breach of contract against insurer and adjuster
  2. 2 Whether expert evidence was required to establish the standard of care for an insurance adjuster
  3. 3 Whether plaintiffs proved causation between alleged chemicals in the home and claimed health injuries

Ratio Decidendi

Applying the non‑suit prima facie test, the court concluded plaintiffs failed to adduce sufficient evidence on the standard of care applicable to an insurance adjuster and on causation linking any toxic chemical at harmful levels to the plaintiffs' health complaints, so claims in negligence and contract (including implied terms) were non‑suitable; however the negligent misstatement claim based on alleged representations that the house was "safe" had sufficient evidence of special relationship, misleading representation, and reliance to proceed; fiduciary duty claim was dismissed for lack of necessary features; equitable fraud claim was not moved against and remains.

Court Disposition

Non‑suit motion granted in part and dismissed in part: negligence and contract causes of action non‑suited (except negligent misstatement based on alleged 'house was safe' statement); fiduciary duty claim dismissed; negligent misstatement and equitable fraud claims remain.

Orders

  • Non‑suit granted as to plaintiffs' claims in negligence and for breach of contract except the negligent misstatement claim based on alleged statements that the house was safe.
  • Claim for breach of fiduciary duty dismissed.