City of Vancouver v. McPhalen

City of Vancouver v. McPhalen

Where a municipal charter imposes an absolute duty to keep highways in repair and grants the corporation adequate powers and means to perform that duty, the municipality is civilly liable in an action for damages to an individual lawfully using the highway who suffers special injury from negligent non-repair, unless the statute or circumstances show a legislative intention to exclude such remedy. The Vancouver charter imposed such an original duty and conferred sufficient powers and funds; accordingly the corporation is liable and the appeal is dismissed.

Citation
(1911) 45 SCR 194
Parties
Appellant (defendant): City of Vancouver; Respondent (plaintiff): William A. McPhalen
Court
Supreme Court of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
6 November 1911
Procedural Posture
Appeal Civil Tort (municipal Law) / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Appeal for British Columbia; Final Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs; judgment of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia affirmed.
Legal Topics
Nonfeasance, Nuisance, Duty to Repair Highways, Civil Liability of Municipalities, Construction of Statute
Source Language
English
Municipal Law Tort Statutory Interpretation Nonfeasance Nuisance Duty to Repair Highways Civil Liability of Municipalities Construction of Statute

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

City of Vancouver

Appellant (defendant)

William A. McPhalen

Respondent (plaintiff)

Procedural Posture

Appeal Civil Tort (municipal Law) / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Appeal for British Columbia; Final Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a municipal corporation is civilly liable for damages to an individual resulting from its nonfeasance in failing to keep highways/sidewalks in repair under a statutory charter duty
  2. 2 Whether absence of an express statutory right of action precludes a private action for damages where statute imposes mandatory duties and grants adequate means
  3. 3 Whether duties transferred from pre-existing bodies not civilly liable differ from duties newly created by statute

Ratio Decidendi

Where a municipal charter imposes an absolute duty to keep highways in repair and grants the corporation adequate powers and means to perform that duty, the municipality is civilly liable in an action for damages to an individual lawfully using the highway who suffers special injury from negligent non-repair, unless the statute or circumstances show a legislative intention to exclude such remedy. The Vancouver charter imposed such an original duty and conferred sufficient powers and funds; accordingly the corporation is liable and the appeal is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs; judgment of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia affirmed.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs to the respondent
  • Judgment appealed from (15 B.C. Rep. 367) affirmed; plaintiff's verdict upheld