R. v. Hicks

R. v. Hicks

Inspector MacKenzie lacked lawful authority to enter the accused's private dwelling place and its attached lands/curtilage absent consent, an order under s.121 or a search warrant under s.120; because the inspector was not exercising lawful powers, the accused's refusal to permit entry, though obstructive in effect, was lawful self‑defense of property and the Crown failed to prove an offence under s.158(d).

Citation
2012 NSPC 44
Parties
Crown: Her Majesty the Queen; Accused: Garth Hicks
Court
Nova Scotia Provincial Court
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
1 June 2012
Procedural Posture
Criminal — Provincial Statutory Offence (environment Act) / Trial / Decision (acquittal)
Outcome
Acquittal of Garth Hicks on the charge of hindering or obstructing an inspector contrary to s.158(d) of the Environment Act.
Legal Topics
Obstruction/hindering of Public Officer, Right of Entry and Inspection, Private Dwelling Exclusion/curtilage, Search Warrants and Statutory Powers, Trespass/self Help (s.41 Criminal Code)
Source Language
English
Environmental Law Criminal Law Administrative Law Property Law Obstruction/hindering of Public Officer Right of Entry and Inspection Private Dwelling Exclusion/curtilage Search Warrants and Statutory Powers +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Her Majesty the Queen

Crown

Garth Hicks

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal — Provincial Statutory Offence (environment Act) / Trial / Decision (acquittal)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the accused's conduct constituted hindering or obstructing an inspector under s.158(d) of the Environment Act
  2. 2 Whether the inspector had lawful authority to enter the accused's property without consent, order or search warrant under ss.119 and 120 of the Environment Act
  3. 3 Whether the accused could lawfully expel the inspector or rely on trespass/self-help (s.41 Criminal Code) given the inspector's statutory authority

Ratio Decidendi

Inspector MacKenzie lacked lawful authority to enter the accused's private dwelling place and its attached lands/curtilage absent consent, an order under s.121 or a search warrant under s.120; because the inspector was not exercising lawful powers, the accused's refusal to permit entry, though obstructive in effect, was lawful self‑defense of property and the Crown failed to prove an offence under s.158(d).

Court Disposition

Acquittal of Garth Hicks on the charge of hindering or obstructing an inspector contrary to s.158(d) of the Environment Act.

Orders

  • Accused acquitted of s.158(d) offence; no conviction entered; no further orders recorded.