R. v. Blackmore
Applications for stays of proceedings were dismissed. Officially induced error failed because the 1992 press release and subsequent non-enforcement were not advice from an appropriate official that polygamy was lawful, the defendants did not establish the required subjective reliance and the elements of the defence were not met. Blackmore's s.7 abuse of process claim failed in the residual category because past impugned conduct (including Attorney General's appointments) was addressed by prior judicial remedy and there was no ongoing misconduct, no improper motive or bad faith, and material changes in law (Polygamy Reference) and evidence justified reconsideration. A constitutional...
- Citation
- 2018 BCSC 367
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Accused / Applicant: Winston Kaye Blackmore; Accused / Applicant: James Marion Oler; Amicus Curiae: Amicus Curiae
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 9 March 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Polygamy (s. 293 Criminal Code) / Post Trial Application for Stay of Proceedings (convictions Found; Applications for Stay Pending)
- Outcome
- Applications for stay of proceedings dismissed; convictions to be registered
- Legal Topics
- Officially Induced Error, Abuse of Process (residual and Main Categories), Special Prosecutor Appointment (crown Counsel Act S.7), Pre Charge Delay, Section 293 Criminal Code (polygamy), Section 2(a) Charter Religious Freedom, Section 7 Charter Liberty/security, Judicial Reference Procedure
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Winston Kaye Blackmore
Accused / Applicant
James Marion Oler
Accused / Applicant
Amicus Curiae
Amicus Curiae
Procedural Posture
Criminal Polygamy (s. 293 Criminal Code) / Post Trial Application for Stay of Proceedings (convictions Found; Applications for Stay Pending)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether officially induced error applies based on provincial Crown press release and long-standing non-enforcement
- 2 Whether a stay of proceedings is required for abuse of process under s.7 of the Charter given Crown conduct over decades
- 3 Whether a constitutional exemption from punishment under s.2 (religious freedom) is available to Blackmore
Ratio Decidendi
Applications for stays of proceedings were dismissed. Officially induced error failed because the 1992 press release and subsequent non-enforcement were not advice from an appropriate official that polygamy was lawful, the defendants did not establish the required subjective reliance and the elements of the defence were not met. Blackmore's s.7 abuse of process claim failed in the residual category because past impugned conduct (including Attorney General's appointments) was addressed by prior judicial remedy and there was no ongoing misconduct, no improper motive or bad faith, and material changes in law (Polygamy Reference) and evidence justified reconsideration. A constitutional...
Court Disposition
Applications for stay of proceedings dismissed; convictions to be registered
Orders
- Application for stay of proceedings dismissed
- Convictions to be registered
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment