Canadian Petrofina Ltd. v. Berger

Canadian Petrofina Ltd. v. Berger

The option was validly exercised when the lessee gave written notice within the five-year period; the 30-day prior notice clause relates to the lessor's obligation to deliver conveyancing documents and does not restrict the timeframe for exercising the option; consequently the landlord-tenant relationship ceased upon exercise and the county court had no jurisdiction to order possession under s.75.

Citation
[1962] SCR 652
Parties
Appellant (plaintiff): Canadian Petrofina Limited; Respondent (defendant): Samuel Berger
Court
Supreme Court of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
11 June 1962
Procedural Posture
Appeal; Landlord and Tenant; Property Law / Final Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada on Leave Granted
Outcome
Appeal allowed; judgments below set aside; application for possession dismissed; costs awarded to appellant throughout.
Legal Topics
Option to Purchase, Exercise of Option, Notice Requirements, Possession Under Landlord and Tenant Statute, Jurisdiction of County Court, Interpretation of Lease Clauses, Specific Performance
Source Language
English
Property Law Landlord and Tenant Conveyancing Contract Law Equity Option to Purchase Exercise of Option Notice Requirements +4 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Canadian Petrofina Limited

Appellant (plaintiff)

Samuel Berger

Respondent (defendant)

Procedural Posture

Appeal; Landlord and Tenant; Property Law / Final Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada on Leave Granted

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the lessee validly exercised the option to purchase within the first five years of the lease
  2. 2 Whether the 30 days' prior written notice clause limited the lessee's right to exercise the option to 30 days before the expiry of the five-year period
  3. 3 Whether the county court had jurisdiction to grant possession under s.75 after the option was validly exercised

Ratio Decidendi

The option was validly exercised when the lessee gave written notice within the five-year period; the 30-day prior notice clause relates to the lessor's obligation to deliver conveyancing documents and does not restrict the timeframe for exercising the option; consequently the landlord-tenant relationship ceased upon exercise and the county court had no jurisdiction to order possession under s.75.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; judgments below set aside; application for possession dismissed; costs awarded to appellant throughout.

Orders

  • Appeal allowed
  • Judgments of the Court of Appeal for Ontario and of the County Court set aside