Massie & Renwick, Limited v. Underwriters' Survey Bureau Ltd. et al.
Court held rating material produced before Jan 1, 1924 vested in the Association members and acquired statutory copyright under s.42; respondents failed to prove title to rating material produced after Jan 1, 1924 (ground for allowing appeal in that respect); plans and revisions produced by or vested in the Underwriters' Survey Bureau were owned by the Bureau either by assignment from Goad or by virtue of works made by salaried employees under s.12(b) and s.20(3) presumptions, and the limitation period was tolled by fraudulent concealment; criminal conspiracy defence rejected on facts.
- Citation
- [1940] SCR 218
- Parties
- Appellant / Defendant: Massie & Renwick, Limited; Respondent / Plaintiffs: Underwriters' Survey Bureau, Limited and Others
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 19 January 1940
- Procedural Posture
- Copyright Infringement and Conversion / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Exchequer Court of Canada
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part and dismissed in part
- Legal Topics
- Ownership of Copyright, Employer/employee Authorship, Unpublished Works, Assignment of Copyright, Limitation and Fraudulent Concealment, Criminal Conspiracy Allegation, Conversion and Trover/detinue, Statutory Presumptions
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Massie & Renwick, Limited
Appellant / Defendant
Underwriters' Survey Bureau, Limited and Others
Respondent / Plaintiffs
Procedural Posture
Copyright Infringement and Conversion / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Exchequer Court of Canada
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether rating material and plans were owned by the Association members or by the Bureau and thus who owned copyright under the Copyright Act 1921
- 2 Whether incorporated member companies can be 'authors' or acquire copyright under s.12(b) or s.42
- 3 Whether s.20(3) presumption can identify proprietor or author from printed legend
Ratio Decidendi
Court held rating material produced before Jan 1, 1924 vested in the Association members and acquired statutory copyright under s.42; respondents failed to prove title to rating material produced after Jan 1, 1924 (ground for allowing appeal in that respect); plans and revisions produced by or vested in the Underwriters' Survey Bureau were owned by the Bureau either by assignment from Goad or by virtue of works made by salaried employees under s.12(b) and s.20(3) presumptions, and the limitation period was tolled by fraudulent concealment; criminal conspiracy defence rejected on facts.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part and dismissed in part
Orders
- Appeal allowed in respect of rating material brought into existence after 1 January 1924
- Appeal dismissed in other respects
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment