Bayer Inc. v. Amgen Canada Inc.
Claim 58 is ineligible for listing because it requires known patient SNP status to inform reduced quarterly dosing after a year of monthly treatment, whereas the NOC-approved change permits monthly dosing in year one for all patients based solely on visual/anatomic outcomes with no genetic criterion; this mismatch means the patent does not claim the very change in use approved by the SNDS and therefore fails paragraph 4(3)(c).
- Citation
- 2024 FC 1849
- Parties
- Plaintiff/defendant by Counterclaim: Bayer Inc.; Plaintiff/defendant by Counterclaim: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim: Amgen Canada Inc.
- Court
- Federal Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 4 December 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Patent Infringement Under the Patented Medicines (notice of Compliance) Regulations / Motion Under Subsection 6.07(1) for Declaration of Ineligibility of Patent for Listing and Lifting of 24 Month Stay
- Outcome
- Motion granted. Canadian Patent No. 3,007,276 declared ineligible for inclusion on the Patent Register; costs awarded to defendant in accordance with parties' agreement.
- Legal Topics
- PMNOC Regulations, Patent Listing Eligibility, Claim Construction, Abbott Test, Notice of Compliance, Biosimilar Regulatory Stay
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bayer Inc.
Plaintiff/defendant by Counterclaim
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Plaintiff/defendant by Counterclaim
Amgen Canada Inc.
Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim
Procedural Posture
Patent Infringement Under the Patented Medicines (notice of Compliance) Regulations / Motion Under Subsection 6.07(1) for Declaration of Ineligibility of Patent for Listing and Lifting of 24 Month Stay
Legal Issues
- 1 What use is claimed by Claim 58 of the 276 Patent?
- 2 What change in use was approved by the NOC issued in response to SNDS 204121?
- 3 Does Claim 58 claim the very change in use approved by the NOC?
Ratio Decidendi
Claim 58 is ineligible for listing because it requires known patient SNP status to inform reduced quarterly dosing after a year of monthly treatment, whereas the NOC-approved change permits monthly dosing in year one for all patients based solely on visual/anatomic outcomes with no genetic criterion; this mismatch means the patent does not claim the very change in use approved by the SNDS and therefore fails paragraph 4(3)(c).
Court Disposition
Motion granted. Canadian Patent No. 3,007,276 declared ineligible for inclusion on the Patent Register; costs awarded to defendant in accordance with parties' agreement.
Orders
- The Defendant’s motion is granted.
- Canadian Patent No. 3,007,276 is ineligible for inclusion on the register maintained by the Minister in accordance with subsection 3(2) and section 4 of the PMNOC Regulations with respect to EYLEA® 2 mg/0.05 mL solution, DINs 02415992 and 02505355.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment