CF v Canada Employment Insurance Commission
The claimant proved by credible, detailed and consistent evidence (including the application indicating 52 weeks, testimony about planned 52-week return-to-work, and circumstances of an early birth) that she intended the standard parental option (35 weeks of parental benefits plus 15 weeks of maternity benefits), so the election on the application is to be treated as for standard parental benefits and the appeal is allowed.
- Citation
- 2022 SST 547
- Parties
- Appellant (claimant): C. F.; Respondent (commission): Canada Employment Insurance Commission
- Court
- Social Security Tribunal of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 17 February 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Insurance Parental Benefits / General Division Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Parental Benefits Election, Irrevocable Election, Mistake in Application, Reconsideration
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
C. F.
Appellant (claimant)
Canada Employment Insurance Commission
Respondent (commission)
Procedural Posture
Employment Insurance Parental Benefits / General Division Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant intended to elect the standard 35-week parental benefits or the extended 61-week option when she completed her application
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant proved by credible, detailed and consistent evidence (including the application indicating 52 weeks, testimony about planned 52-week return-to-work, and circumstances of an early birth) that she intended the standard parental option (35 weeks of parental benefits plus 15 weeks of maternity benefits), so the election on the application is to be treated as for standard parental benefits and the appeal is allowed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Claimant's election is treated as for standard parental benefits (35 weeks parental benefits plus 15 weeks maternity benefits); Commission's reconsideration decision is set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment