TA6-08897

TA6-08897

Claim rejected because the Panel found the claimant not credible, concluded she did not discharge the burden to establish a well‑founded fear of persecution on a Convention ground, and accepted that state protection or internal relocation in Thailand was a reasonable possibility; therefore she is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection.

Citation
TA6-08897
Parties
Claimant: XXXXXXXXXX
Court
Refugee Protection Division
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
28 November 2007
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim / Oral Hearing With Immediate Oral Decision; Written Reasons Issued Later
Outcome
Claim rejected; claimant is not a Convention refugee and not a person in need of protection
Legal Topics
Particular Social Group, State Protection, Credibility Assessment, Well Founded Fear, Internal Flight Alternative
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XXXXXXXXXX

Claimant

Procedural Posture

Refugee Protection Claim / Oral Hearing With Immediate Oral Decision; Written Reasons Issued Later

  1. 1 Whether claimant is a Convention refugee
  2. 2 Whether claimant belongs to a particular social group (women/domestic violence victims)
  3. 3 Whether claimant has a well-founded fear of persecution

Ratio Decidendi

Claim rejected because the Panel found the claimant not credible, concluded she did not discharge the burden to establish a well‑founded fear of persecution on a Convention ground, and accepted that state protection or internal relocation in Thailand was a reasonable possibility; therefore she is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection.

Court Disposition

Claim rejected; claimant is not a Convention refugee and not a person in need of protection