TA6-08897
Claim rejected because the Panel found the claimant not credible, concluded she did not discharge the burden to establish a well‑founded fear of persecution on a Convention ground, and accepted that state protection or internal relocation in Thailand was a reasonable possibility; therefore she is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection.
- Citation
- TA6-08897
- Parties
- Claimant: XXXXXXXXXX
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 28 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Claim / Oral Hearing With Immediate Oral Decision; Written Reasons Issued Later
- Outcome
- Claim rejected; claimant is not a Convention refugee and not a person in need of protection
- Legal Topics
- Particular Social Group, State Protection, Credibility Assessment, Well Founded Fear, Internal Flight Alternative
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXXXXXXXX
Claimant
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim / Oral Hearing With Immediate Oral Decision; Written Reasons Issued Later
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimant is a Convention refugee
- 2 Whether claimant belongs to a particular social group (women/domestic violence victims)
- 3 Whether claimant has a well-founded fear of persecution
Ratio Decidendi
Claim rejected because the Panel found the claimant not credible, concluded she did not discharge the burden to establish a well‑founded fear of persecution on a Convention ground, and accepted that state protection or internal relocation in Thailand was a reasonable possibility; therefore she is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection.
Court Disposition
Claim rejected; claimant is not a Convention refugee and not a person in need of protection
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment