2019 RLLR 29
Claimants established on balance of probabilities that they are genuine Falun Gong practitioners who were subjected to arrests, detention and torture and that objective country evidence shows Falun Gong practitioners face persecution across China; state protection and internal flight alternative are not available, therefore they are Convention refugees.
- Citation
- 2019 RLLR 29
- Parties
- Claimant (mother): [XXX]; Claimant (daughter): [XXX]
- Court
- Royal Canadian Mounted Police Labour Relations
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 18 November 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Convention Refugee Claim / Decision (oral)
- Outcome
- Claim allowed; claimants found to be Convention refugees
- Legal Topics
- Persecution, Religion/spiritual Belief (falun Gong), State Protection, Internal Flight Alternative, Credibility Assessment, Torture and Ill Treatment
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
[XXX]
Claimant (mother)
[XXX]
Claimant (daughter)
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Convention Refugee Claim / Decision (oral)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimants qualify as Convention refugees
- 2 Whether persecution was on account of religion/spiritual belief (Falun Gong)
- 3 Whether state protection is available
Ratio Decidendi
Claimants established on balance of probabilities that they are genuine Falun Gong practitioners who were subjected to arrests, detention and torture and that objective country evidence shows Falun Gong practitioners face persecution across China; state protection and internal flight alternative are not available, therefore they are Convention refugees.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed; claimants found to be Convention refugees
Orders
- Claimants granted refugee protection
- Notice of decision to be mailed to claimants and counsel
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment