Woods v. Smeltzer
On the balance of probabilities the Adjudicator found that personal service occurred on September 20, 2019 (papers were presented and left at the defendant's feet); therefore the defendant had adequate notice, no reasonable excuse for failing to respond, and the application to set aside the judgment was dismissed.
- Citation
- 2020 NSSM 21
- Parties
- Claimant (respondent): Gary Woods; Claimant (respondent): Wendy Woods; Defendant (applicant): Brenda A. Smeltzer
- Court
- Nova Scotia Small Claims Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 19 October 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Small Claims Court / Application to Set Aside Judgment
- Outcome
- Application to set aside judgment dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Personal Service, Default Judgment, Setting Aside Judgment, Credibility Assessment
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gary Woods
Claimant (respondent)
Wendy Woods
Claimant (respondent)
Brenda A. Smeltzer
Defendant (applicant)
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Court / Application to Set Aside Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether personal service was effected on September 20, 2019
- 2 Whether the defendant has a reasonable excuse for not filing a defence or attending the hearing
- 3 Whether the default judgment should be set aside
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities the Adjudicator found that personal service occurred on September 20, 2019 (papers were presented and left at the defendant's feet); therefore the defendant had adequate notice, no reasonable excuse for failing to respond, and the application to set aside the judgment was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application to set aside judgment dismissed
Orders
- Application to set aside judgment dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment