Nova Scotia (Attorney General) v. C.G.
The offence of exercising control, direction or influence over movements for prostitution required a custodial sentence to achieve denunciation and deterrence; given the accused's prior record, breaches and demonstrated untrustworthiness, a conditional sentence was inappropriate and a 30‑month federal incarceration with consideration of remand time (approximately two months credit) was required.
- Citation
- 2002 NSSC 8
- Parties
- Crown: Attorney General; Accused: C. G.
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 10 January 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Accused convicted and sentenced to 30 months imprisonment in a federal institution.
- Legal Topics
- Pimping, Prostitution, Conditional Sentence, Remand Credit, Denunciation and Deterrence, Publication Ban
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Crown
C. G.
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a conditional sentence was appropriate
- 2 Appropriate length of custody for offence under s.212(1)(h) Criminal Code
- 3 Calculation of remand credit
Ratio Decidendi
The offence of exercising control, direction or influence over movements for prostitution required a custodial sentence to achieve denunciation and deterrence; given the accused's prior record, breaches and demonstrated untrustworthiness, a conditional sentence was inappropriate and a 30‑month federal incarceration with consideration of remand time (approximately two months credit) was required.
Court Disposition
Accused convicted and sentenced to 30 months imprisonment in a federal institution.
Orders
- Imposition of 30 months imprisonment
- Credit for time in remand: approximately 2 months (enhanced credit applied)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment