R. v. Perkins

R. v. Perkins

On the totality of the evidence — surveillance placing Perkins at the locations, keys found in his vehicle that opened the barn/locker/safes, fingerprints inside a safe, matching documentary lists and packaging, physical linkage of seized items across locations, and Perkins' admissions in interview — the Crown...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2018 BCSC 823
Parties
Crown: Regina; Accused: Corey Jim Perkins
Court
Supreme Court of British Columbia
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
12 March 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Possession and Trafficking; Firearms Offences / Trial Judgment (conviction)
Outcome
Accused found guilty on all counts
Legal Topics
Possession, Constructive Possession, Joint Possession, Possession for the Purpose of Trafficking, Admissions and Police Interview, Use of Keys and Documentary Evidence to Prove Control
Source Language
english
Criminal Law Controlled Drugs and Substances Act Firearms/weapons Law Evidence Possession Constructive Possession Joint Possession Possession for the Purpose of Trafficking +2 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Crown

Corey Jim Perkins

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal Possession and Trafficking; Firearms Offences / Trial Judgment (conviction)

  1. 1 Whether the Crown proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused possessed the controlled substances found (Counts 1 and 2) and that possession was for the purpose of trafficking
  2. 2 Whether the Crown proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused possessed the firearms, magazines, and silencers (Counts 3–10)
  3. 3 Whether evidence of keys, surveillance, documents, fingerprints, and admissions establish knowledge and control

Ratio Decidendi

On the totality of the evidence — surveillance placing Perkins at the locations, keys found in his vehicle that opened the barn/locker/safes, fingerprints inside a safe, matching documentary lists and packaging, physical linkage of seized items across locations, and Perkins' admissions in interview — the Crown proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Perkins had the requisite knowledge and control to constitute possession of the drugs and firearms (and that the drugs, except those at the Green Avenue residence, were possessed for the purpose of trafficking).

Court Disposition

Accused found guilty on all counts

Orders

  • Found guilty on Counts 1 through 10 of the indictment