R. v. Billyard

R. v. Billyard

Cumulative circumstantial evidence linking the accused to the premises, together with the scale and maintenance requirements of the grow, established beyond a reasonable doubt that he had knowledge and control of the cannabis plants and that the operation was for trafficking, warranting conviction on both counts.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2010 BCSC 284
Parties
Crown: Regina; Accused: Gregory James Billyard
Court
Supreme Court of British Columbia
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
5 January 2010
Procedural Posture
Criminal Possession for Purpose of Trafficking and Production of Cannabis / Trial Judgment Conviction Recorded
Outcome
Accused found guilty on both counts
Legal Topics
Possession for Purpose of Trafficking, Production of Cannabis, Circumstantial Evidence, Knowledge and Control
Source Language
english
Criminal Law Controlled Substances Evidence Possession for Purpose of Trafficking Production of Cannabis Circumstantial Evidence Knowledge and Control

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Crown

Gregory James Billyard

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal Possession for Purpose of Trafficking and Production of Cannabis / Trial Judgment Conviction Recorded

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the accused had knowledge and control of the cannabis plants
  2. 2 Whether the quantity and scale of the operation established trafficking rather than personal use
  3. 3 Whether circumstantial evidence was sufficient to convict beyond a reasonable doubt

Ratio Decidendi

Cumulative circumstantial evidence linking the accused to the premises, together with the scale and maintenance requirements of the grow, established beyond a reasonable doubt that he had knowledge and control of the cannabis plants and that the operation was for trafficking, warranting conviction on both counts.

Court Disposition

Accused found guilty on both counts

Orders

  • Convicted on Count 1: unlawful possession of cannabis for the purpose of trafficking (over three kilograms)
  • Convicted on Count 2: unlawful production of cannabis