R. v. Roberts
Applying the law on possession and circumstantial evidence the court acquitted Williams because his utterance and the unopened mail were vague and could support innocent inferences and did not establish knowledge and control beyond a reasonable doubt; the court convicted Roberts because multiple items linked to him (recognizance and personal form listing 8 Bashful Ave, an envelope addressed to 'Uncle Tony' with a debt sheet found among his papers, an RBC statement found in bedroom 2, the gym bag containing large quantities of drugs and trafficking paraphernalia, visible brass knuckles in a bathroom cabinet and ammunition in the same bedroom) combined with expert opinion established...
- Citation
- 2018 NSPC 54
- Parties
- Crown: Her Majesty The Queen; Accused: Anthony Douglas Roberts; Accused: Antoine Steve Williams
- Court
- Nova Scotia Provincial Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 29 October 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Possession for the Purpose of Trafficking / Provincial Court Trial Decision (conviction/acquittal)
- Outcome
- Anthony Douglas Roberts: convicted of possession for the purpose of trafficking (cocaine and cannabis), possession of a prohibited weapon (brass knuckles), possession of ammunition and breaches of recognizance; Antoine Steve Williams: acquitted of all charged offences.
- Legal Topics
- Possession for the Purpose of Trafficking, Constructive Possession, Knowledge and Control, Circumstantial Evidence and Burden of Proof, Probation/recognizance Breaches, Utterances and Evidential Weight
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty The Queen
Crown
Anthony Douglas Roberts
Accused
Antoine Steve Williams
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Possession for the Purpose of Trafficking / Provincial Court Trial Decision (conviction/acquittal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Crown proved knowledge and control required for possession for purpose of trafficking (s.5(2) CDSA)
- 2 Whether either accused had personal or constructive possession of brass knuckles (s.91(2) CC)
- 3 Whether either accused had possession of ammunition contrary to prohibition order (s.117.01(1) CC)
Ratio Decidendi
Applying the law on possession and circumstantial evidence the court acquitted Williams because his utterance and the unopened mail were vague and could support innocent inferences and did not establish knowledge and control beyond a reasonable doubt; the court convicted Roberts because multiple items linked to him (recognizance and personal form listing 8 Bashful Ave, an envelope addressed to 'Uncle Tony' with a debt sheet found among his papers, an RBC statement found in bedroom 2, the gym bag containing large quantities of drugs and trafficking paraphernalia, visible brass knuckles in a bathroom cabinet and ammunition in the same bedroom) combined with expert opinion established...
Court Disposition
Anthony Douglas Roberts: convicted of possession for the purpose of trafficking (cocaine and cannabis), possession of a prohibited weapon (brass knuckles), possession of ammunition and breaches of recognizance; Antoine Steve Williams: acquitted of all charged offences.
Orders
- Anthony Douglas Roberts found guilty of possession for the purpose of trafficking contrary to s.5(2) Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (cocaine and cannabis).
- Anthony Douglas Roberts found guilty of possession of a prohibited weapon contrary to s.91(2) Criminal Code (brass knuckles).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment