Employer’s Liability Assurance Corp. Ltd. v. Ideal Petroleum (1959) Ltd.
The five-year commercial prescription under the Bankruptcy Act applied but was suspended because it was 'absolutely impossible' for the creditor to act while the debtor complied with an accepted proposal; the applicable bankruptcy date for s.64 purposes is the date of the assignment (October 6, 1961) because the 1958 petition did not result in a receiving order and an approved proposal under the 1952 Act is not an act of bankruptcy; therefore the 1957-58 payments fell outside s.64's three‑month avoidance period and could not be annulled, but dividends paid under the proposal to which respondent had no entitlement must be returned, leading to a partial allowance of the appeal.
- Citation
- [1978] 1 SCR 230
- Parties
- Appellant / Plaintiff: Employer’s Liability Assurance Corporation Limited; Respondent / Defendant: Ideal Petroleum (1959) Ltd.
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 7 December 1976
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Appeal / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Appeal for Québec; Judgment Delivered December 7, 1976
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; Quebec Court of Appeal judgment amended; respondent ordered to pay specified sums to appellant
- Legal Topics
- Preferential Payments, Prescription (statute of Limitations), Suspension of Prescription (contra Non Valentem), Composition Proposal / Proposal to Creditors, Relation Back of Bankruptcy, Paulian Action
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Employer’s Liability Assurance Corporation Limited
Appellant / Plaintiff
Ideal Petroleum (1959) Ltd.
Respondent / Defendant
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Appeal / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Appeal for Québec; Judgment Delivered December 7, 1976
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the action was barred by prescription under the Civil Code and Bankruptcy Act
- 2 Whether prescription was suspended by impossibility to act (art. 2232 Civil Code) until the proposal/assignment
- 3 Whether the date of bankruptcy for s.64 purposes could be related back to the 1958 petition or the 1958 proposal
Ratio Decidendi
The five-year commercial prescription under the Bankruptcy Act applied but was suspended because it was 'absolutely impossible' for the creditor to act while the debtor complied with an accepted proposal; the applicable bankruptcy date for s.64 purposes is the date of the assignment (October 6, 1961) because the 1958 petition did not result in a receiving order and an approved proposal under the 1952 Act is not an act of bankruptcy; therefore the 1957-58 payments fell outside s.64's three‑month avoidance period and could not be annulled, but dividends paid under the proposal to which respondent had no entitlement must be returned, leading to a partial allowance of the appeal.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; Quebec Court of Appeal judgment amended; respondent ordered to pay specified sums to appellant
Orders
- Respondent to pay appellant the sum of 2,806.10 CAD
- Interest at the legal rate from the date of notice of the action on the sum awarded
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment