Employer’s Liability Assurance Corp. Ltd. v. Ideal Petroleum (1959) Ltd.

Employer’s Liability Assurance Corp. Ltd. v. Ideal Petroleum (1959) Ltd.

The five-year commercial prescription under the Bankruptcy Act applied but was suspended because it was 'absolutely impossible' for the creditor to act while the debtor complied with an accepted proposal; the applicable bankruptcy date for s.64 purposes is the date of the assignment (October 6, 1961) because the 1958 petition did not result in a receiving order and an approved proposal under the 1952 Act is not an act of bankruptcy; therefore the 1957-58 payments fell outside s.64's three‑month avoidance period and could not be annulled, but dividends paid under the proposal to which respondent had no entitlement must be returned, leading to a partial allowance of the appeal.

Citation
[1978] 1 SCR 230
Parties
Appellant / Plaintiff: Employer’s Liability Assurance Corporation Limited; Respondent / Defendant: Ideal Petroleum (1959) Ltd.
Court
Supreme Court of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
7 December 1976
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Appeal / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Appeal for Québec; Judgment Delivered December 7, 1976
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part; Quebec Court of Appeal judgment amended; respondent ordered to pay specified sums to appellant
Legal Topics
Preferential Payments, Prescription (statute of Limitations), Suspension of Prescription (contra Non Valentem), Composition Proposal / Proposal to Creditors, Relation Back of Bankruptcy, Paulian Action
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Employer’s Liability Assurance Corporation Limited

Appellant / Plaintiff

Ideal Petroleum (1959) Ltd.

Respondent / Defendant

Procedural Posture

Bankruptcy Appeal / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Appeal for Québec; Judgment Delivered December 7, 1976

  1. 1 Whether the action was barred by prescription under the Civil Code and Bankruptcy Act
  2. 2 Whether prescription was suspended by impossibility to act (art. 2232 Civil Code) until the proposal/assignment
  3. 3 Whether the date of bankruptcy for s.64 purposes could be related back to the 1958 petition or the 1958 proposal

Ratio Decidendi

The five-year commercial prescription under the Bankruptcy Act applied but was suspended because it was 'absolutely impossible' for the creditor to act while the debtor complied with an accepted proposal; the applicable bankruptcy date for s.64 purposes is the date of the assignment (October 6, 1961) because the 1958 petition did not result in a receiving order and an approved proposal under the 1952 Act is not an act of bankruptcy; therefore the 1957-58 payments fell outside s.64's three‑month avoidance period and could not be annulled, but dividends paid under the proposal to which respondent had no entitlement must be returned, leading to a partial allowance of the appeal.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part; Quebec Court of Appeal judgment amended; respondent ordered to pay specified sums to appellant

Orders

  • Respondent to pay appellant the sum of 2,806.10 CAD
  • Interest at the legal rate from the date of notice of the action on the sum awarded