McDonald v. Fond du Lac Denesuline First Nation
The Appeal Board was not properly constituted because members were selected by the CEO rather than by the Membership at a special Band meeting and no valid BCRs effectuated the appointments; the CEO breached procedural fairness by failing to check and acknowledge registered appeal materials and by removing candidates from the ballot without adequate notice or opportunity to respond; an Appeal Board member provided evidence against an appellant creating a reasonable apprehension of bias; these defects rendered the Appeal Decisions void and justified certiorari setting them aside and remitting the appeals to a newly and properly constituted Appeal Board with strict timelines and court...
- Citation
- 2022 FC 844
- Parties
- Applicant (candidate and Elector): Gerald Felix McDonald; Applicant (candidate and Elector): Mark Pacquette; Respondent (band): Fond du Lac Denesuline First Nation; Respondent (former Chief): Louie Mercredi; Respondent (former Councillor): Willie John Laurent; Respondent (former Councillor): Jake Mercredi; Respondent (former Councillor): Ronnie Augier; Respondent (former Councillor): Andrew Isadore; Respondent (former Councillor): Frederick Martin; Respondent (chief Electoral Officer): Derek McDonald; Respondent (deputy Electoral Officer): Jules Lidguerre
- Court
- Federal Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 7 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment (reasons Issued)
- Outcome
- Application for judicial review allowed; Appeal Decisions quashed; appeals remitted to a newly and properly constituted Appeal Board; Court retains jurisdiction to oversee implementation
- Legal Topics
- Procedural Fairness, Appeal Board Constitution, Electoral Process and Compliance, Judicial Remedies (certiorari, Remittal)
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gerald Felix McDonald
Applicant (candidate and Elector)
Mark Pacquette
Applicant (candidate and Elector)
Fond du Lac Denesuline First Nation
Respondent (band)
Louie Mercredi
Respondent (former Chief)
Willie John Laurent
Respondent (former Councillor)
Jake Mercredi
Respondent (former Councillor)
Ronnie Augier
Respondent (former Councillor)
Andrew Isadore
Respondent (former Councillor)
Frederick Martin
Respondent (former Councillor)
Derek McDonald
Respondent (chief Electoral Officer)
Jules Lidguerre
Respondent (deputy Electoral Officer)
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment (reasons Issued)
Legal Issues
- 1 Was the Appeal Board properly constituted?
- 2 Did the CEO and/or Appeal Board breach procedural fairness?
- 3 Did the General Election comply with the Election Act?
Ratio Decidendi
The Appeal Board was not properly constituted because members were selected by the CEO rather than by the Membership at a special Band meeting and no valid BCRs effectuated the appointments; the CEO breached procedural fairness by failing to check and acknowledge registered appeal materials and by removing candidates from the ballot without adequate notice or opportunity to respond; an Appeal Board member provided evidence against an appellant creating a reasonable apprehension of bias; these defects rendered the Appeal Decisions void and justified certiorari setting them aside and remitting the appeals to a newly and properly constituted Appeal Board with strict timelines and court...
Court Disposition
Application for judicial review allowed; Appeal Decisions quashed; appeals remitted to a newly and properly constituted Appeal Board; Court retains jurisdiction to oversee implementation
Orders
- The Appeal Decisions are quashed.
- The Respondent Fond du Lac Denesuline First Nation is ordered to hold a special Band meeting to appoint the Appeal Board in accordance with section 3.3 of the Election Act within 14 days of this Order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment