Esson v. McGregor
The court held that the defendant was affected with the contractor's knowledge or, at least, the superintendent was in a position to know whether the machine worked properly; therefore the defence of failure of consideration and the application for a new trial were not sustainable and the refusal of a new trial was proper.
- Citation
- (1892) 20 SCR 176
- Parties
- Appellant; Plaintiff: Esson; Respondent; Defendant: McGregor
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 22 February 1892
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Supreme Court of Canada Judgment on Appeal From New Brunswick
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Promissory Note, Failure of Consideration, Delay in Objecting, Agency and Imputed Knowledge, New Trial
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Esson
Appellant; Plaintiff
McGregor
Respondent; Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Supreme Court of Canada Judgment on Appeal From New Brunswick
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the promissory note defence of failure of consideration succeeded because the machine did not perform as represented
- 2 Whether defendant was entitled to a new trial given delay in objecting to defects
- 3 Whether knowledge of the machine's defects could be imputed to the defendant through the contractor or the superintendent
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the defendant was affected with the contractor's knowledge or, at least, the superintendent was in a position to know whether the machine worked properly; therefore the defence of failure of consideration and the application for a new trial were not sustainable and the refusal of a new trial was proper.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment