Kimvar Enterprises Inc. v. Nextnine Limited

Kimvar Enterprises Inc. v. Nextnine Limited

The Quit Claim deed was clear and unambiguous and its plain meaning determined the parties' rights without resort to other referable documents; therefore the appeal against the application judge’s interpretation was dismissed and leave to appeal the costs order was denied.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2010 ONCA 792
Parties
Applicant (respondent in Appeal): Kimvar Enterprises Inc.; Respondent (appellant): Nextnine Limited
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
22 November 2010
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Superior Court Judgment (gilmore J., Nov 12, 2009); Court of Appeal Hearing Nov 18, 2010; Decision Nov 19, 2010; Leave to Appeal Costs Application Considered
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; leave to appeal costs denied; costs of the appeal fixed at $30,000 to the respondent inclusive of disbursements and taxes.
Legal Topics
Quit Claim Deed Interpretation, Costs, Leave to Appeal
Source Language
english
Property Law Civil Procedure Appeals Quit Claim Deed Interpretation Costs Leave to Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kimvar Enterprises Inc.

Applicant (respondent in Appeal)

Nextnine Limited

Respondent (appellant)

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Superior Court Judgment (gilmore J., Nov 12, 2009); Court of Appeal Hearing Nov 18, 2010; Decision Nov 19, 2010; Leave to Appeal Costs Application Considered

  1. 1 Whether the Quit Claim deed was ambiguous and required reference to other documents
  2. 2 Whether the application judge erred in interpreting the Quit Claim deed
  3. 3 Whether leave to appeal the costs order should be granted

Ratio Decidendi

The Quit Claim deed was clear and unambiguous and its plain meaning determined the parties' rights without resort to other referable documents; therefore the appeal against the application judge’s interpretation was dismissed and leave to appeal the costs order was denied.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; leave to appeal costs denied; costs of the appeal fixed at $30,000 to the respondent inclusive of disbursements and taxes.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed.
  • Leave to appeal costs denied.