Jaansoo v. Canadian General Insurance Company

Jaansoo v. Canadian General Insurance Company

The Court held that although a legal 'significant benefit' threshold is impermissible, the trial judge's evidentiary finding that the T.E.A.C.H. program would confer at most an insignificant benefit meant it was not a reasonable expense; the appeal is dismissed except that leave to appeal the costs order is granted...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
C30221
Parties
Plaintiff (appellant): Ronald Jaansoo; Defendant (respondent): Canadian General Insurance Company
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
28 February 2000
Procedural Posture
Collection (civil) / Appeal Court of Appeal Decision on Appeal From Trial Judgment Dated June 16, 1998
Outcome
Appeal dismissed except as to costs; leave to appeal costs granted; trial costs order set aside; no order as to costs of the trial.
Legal Topics
Reasonable Expense, Rehabilitation Program Coverage, T.e.a.c.h. Program, Costs Order
Source Language
english
Civil Insurance Costs Appeal Reasonable Expense Rehabilitation Program Coverage T.e.a.c.h. Program Costs Order

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ronald Jaansoo

Plaintiff (appellant)

Canadian General Insurance Company

Defendant (respondent)

Procedural Posture

Collection (civil) / Appeal Court of Appeal Decision on Appeal From Trial Judgment Dated June 16, 1998

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in law by requiring that a reasonable expense must confer a significant benefit
  2. 2 Whether the proposed T.E.A.C.H. program was a reasonable expense payable by the respondent
  3. 3 Whether the costs order made at trial should be set aside

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that although a legal 'significant benefit' threshold is impermissible, the trial judge's evidentiary finding that the T.E.A.C.H. program would confer at most an insignificant benefit meant it was not a reasonable expense; the appeal is dismissed except that leave to appeal the costs order is granted and the trial costs order is set aside with no order as to trial costs.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed except as to costs; leave to appeal costs granted; trial costs order set aside; no order as to costs of the trial.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal costs granted.
  • The appeal is allowed as to costs.