University of Guelph Central Student Association v. Canadian Federation of Students

University of Guelph Central Student Association v. Canadian Federation of Students

Because the application judge failed to provide any reasons, appellate review was impossible; the Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and remitted the matter to a different judge of the Superior Court, leaving costs to be determined by the application judge.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2011 ONCA 474
Parties
Applicant (respondent in Appeal): University of Guelph Central Student Association; Respondent (appellant): Canadian Federation of Students; Respondent (appellant): Canadian Federation of Students – Ontario
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
22 June 2011
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal From Superior Court of Justice; Remitted to a Different Judge
Outcome
Appeal allowed; matter remitted to a different judge of the Superior Court of Justice; costs reserved to the application judge.
Legal Topics
Reasons for Judgment, Remittal, Costs Reservation
Source Language
english
Civil Procedure Appellate Practice Judicial Reasons Reasons for Judgment Remittal Costs Reservation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

University of Guelph Central Student Association

Applicant (respondent in Appeal)

Canadian Federation of Students

Respondent (appellant)

Canadian Federation of Students – Ontario

Respondent (appellant)

Procedural Posture

Civil / Appeal From Superior Court of Justice; Remitted to a Different Judge

  1. 1 Whether the application judge's failure to provide reasons precluded effective appellate review
  2. 2 Whether the appropriate remedy is to allow the appeal and remit the matter to a different judge
  3. 3 Who should determine costs when reasons are lacking

Ratio Decidendi

Because the application judge failed to provide any reasons, appellate review was impossible; the Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and remitted the matter to a different judge of the Superior Court, leaving costs to be determined by the application judge.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; matter remitted to a different judge of the Superior Court of Justice; costs reserved to the application judge.

Orders

  • Appeal allowed
  • Matter remitted to a different judge of the Superior Court of Justice