Scanwood Canada Ltd. (Re)
The motion was dismissed because Homag failed to prove objective material prejudice; its affidavit contained only opinion and bald assertions without evidence of offers or marketing or quantitative analysis; the potential benefit to Homag did not outweigh the demonstrable benefit to the general body of creditors from an en bloc sale and lifting the stay would unfairly prejudice other creditors and interfere with DIP and administration charge priorities.
- Citation
- 2011 NSSC 189
- Parties
- Applicant / Secured Creditor (pmsi Holder): Homag Canada Inc.; Debtor: Scanwood Canada Limited; Court Appointed Receiver: Receiver; Secured Creditor / Respondent: Royal Bank of Canada; Creditor / Respondent (minister of Economic and Rural Development and Tourism): Province of Nova Scotia; DIP Lender / Respondent: TCE Capital Corp.; Creditor / Respondent: Green Hunt Wedlake
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 1 June 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Receivership Motion Arising in Insolvency Proceedings (companies' Creditors Arrangement Act Context) / Interlocutory Motion to Lift Stay / Enforcement of Security
- Outcome
- Motion dismissed; stay remains in effect
- Legal Topics
- Receivership, Lifting Stay, Purchase Money Security Interest (pmsi), Priority of Charges, DIP Financing, Sale En Bloc, Costs Allocation
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Homag Canada Inc.
Applicant / Secured Creditor (pmsi Holder)
Scanwood Canada Limited
Debtor
Receiver
Court Appointed Receiver
Royal Bank of Canada
Secured Creditor / Respondent
Province of Nova Scotia
Creditor / Respondent (minister of Economic and Rural Development and Tourism)
TCE Capital Corp.
DIP Lender / Respondent
Green Hunt Wedlake
Creditor / Respondent
Procedural Posture
Receivership Motion Arising in Insolvency Proceedings (companies' Creditors Arrangement Act Context) / Interlocutory Motion to Lift Stay / Enforcement of Security
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should lift the receivership stay to permit Homag to enforce its claimed first-ranking PMSI over specific machinery
- 2 Whether Homag has established material prejudice sufficient to justify lifting the stay
- 3 Whether permitting enforcement would prejudice other secured creditors or interfere with DIP/administration charge priorities
Ratio Decidendi
The motion was dismissed because Homag failed to prove objective material prejudice; its affidavit contained only opinion and bald assertions without evidence of offers or marketing or quantitative analysis; the potential benefit to Homag did not outweigh the demonstrable benefit to the general body of creditors from an en bloc sale and lifting the stay would unfairly prejudice other creditors and interfere with DIP and administration charge priorities.
Court Disposition
Motion dismissed; stay remains in effect
Orders
- Motion dismissed
- Stay in the Receivership Order remains in force
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment