Performance Industries Ltd. v. Sylvan Lake Golf & Tennis Club Ltd.
Rectification was ordered because plaintiff proved a definite prior oral agreement, the written clause misstated the agreed dimension, defendant knowingly permitted the mistake (fraud/equivalent to fraud), the precise correction (change 'feet' to 'yards') was ascertainable and convincing proof supported the rectification; lack of plaintiff due diligence is not an absolute bar to rectification though it is relevant to equitable discretion; punitive damages were not restored because compensatory relief and other sanctions sufficiently achieved retribution, deterrence and denunciation and the punitive award failed the rationality test.
- Citation
- 2002 SCC 19
- Parties
- Appellant/respondent on Cross Appeal: Performance Industries Ltd.; Appellant/respondent on Cross Appeal (individual Directing Mind): Terrance O'Connor; Respondent/appellant on Cross Appeal: Sylvan Lake Golf & Tennis Club Ltd.
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 22 February 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (contract and Tort) / Supreme Court of Canada Decision on Appeal From the Alberta Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Rectification of Contract, Unilateral Mistake, Fraud and Equitable Fraud, Due Diligence and Equitable Discretion, Damages in Lieu of Specific Performance, Punitive Damages Rationality Test, Piercing the Corporate Veil, Solicitor Client Costs
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Performance Industries Ltd.
Appellant/respondent on Cross Appeal
Terrance O'Connor
Appellant/respondent on Cross Appeal (individual Directing Mind)
Sylvan Lake Golf & Tennis Club Ltd.
Respondent/appellant on Cross Appeal
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (contract and Tort) / Supreme Court of Canada Decision on Appeal From the Alberta Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether rectification of a written agreement is available where a prior oral agreement existed but the written document misstated dimensions and the defendant knew of the mistake
- 2 Whether lack of due diligence by the plaintiff is an absolute bar to rectification
- 3 Proper measure of damages in lieu of rectification for an option to develop land
Ratio Decidendi
Rectification was ordered because plaintiff proved a definite prior oral agreement, the written clause misstated the agreed dimension, defendant knowingly permitted the mistake (fraud/equivalent to fraud), the precise correction (change 'feet' to 'yards') was ascertainable and convincing proof supported the rectification; lack of plaintiff due diligence is not an absolute bar to rectification though it is relevant to equitable discretion; punitive damages were not restored because compensatory relief and other sanctions sufficiently achieved retribution, deterrence and denunciation and the punitive award failed the rationality test.
Court Disposition
Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Rectification ordered: clause 18 amended by changing 'one hundred ten (110) feet' to 'yards'
- Compensatory damages awarded to Sylvan in lieu of rectification in the amount of CAD 620,100
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment