Corson v. Morgan
The appeal was allowed and the trial judge's judgment restored because the trial judge's credibility determinations and factual finding of a mutual mistake were entitled to deference; the evidence supported rectification and was not so doubtful as to require reversal by the appellate court.
- Citation
- [1932] SCR 722
- Parties
- Appellant/plaintiff: Corson; Respondent/defendant: Morgan
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 15 June 1932
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (rectification of Deed) / Supreme Court of Canada Judgment on Appeal From Nova Scotia in Banco
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed with costs; judgment of trial judge restored
- Legal Topics
- Rectification of Deeds, Mutual Mistake, Credibility of Witnesses, Appellate Review of Findings of Fact
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Corson
Appellant/plaintiff
Morgan
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (rectification of Deed) / Supreme Court of Canada Judgment on Appeal From Nova Scotia in Banco
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the deed should be rectified to reflect the parties' true agreement
- 2 Whether a mutual mistake was proved with the required certainty
- 3 Whether the appellate court should overturn the trial judge's findings of credibility and fact
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was allowed and the trial judge's judgment restored because the trial judge's credibility determinations and factual finding of a mutual mistake were entitled to deference; the evidence supported rectification and was not so doubtful as to require reversal by the appellate court.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed with costs; judgment of trial judge restored
Orders
- Appeal allowed with costs
- Judgment of Graham J. (trial judge) restoring rectification of deed is restored
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment