R. v. Miller
Although the court found the officer had reasonable suspicion to demand an ASD test, the prosecution failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused knowingly and unequivocally refused the demand because of unresolved credibility and reliability issues and plausible misunderstanding that she had agreed to be taken to the detachment to provide a sample; therefore the accused was acquitted.
- Citation
- 2021 NSPC 10
- Parties
- Crown: R.; Accused: Mary Miller
- Court
- Nova Scotia Provincial Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 9 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Refusal to Provide Breath Sample (s.320.15 Criminal Code) / Trial Judgment
- Outcome
- Acquitted (Not Guilty)
- Legal Topics
- Refusal to Provide Breath Sample, Approved Screening Device (asd), Reasonable Suspicion, Credibility Assessment, W.d. Assessment
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R.
Crown
Mary Miller
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Refusal to Provide Breath Sample (s.320.15 Criminal Code) / Trial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the peace officer had reasonable grounds to demand a breath sample under s.320.27(1)
- 2 Whether the accused knowingly failed or refused to comply with a demand under s.320.15
- 3 Whether the accused's words and conduct constituted a clear and unequivocal refusal
Ratio Decidendi
Although the court found the officer had reasonable suspicion to demand an ASD test, the prosecution failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused knowingly and unequivocally refused the demand because of unresolved credibility and reliability issues and plausible misunderstanding that she had agreed to be taken to the detachment to provide a sample; therefore the accused was acquitted.
Court Disposition
Acquitted (Not Guilty)
Orders
- Mary Miller is acquitted of the offence contrary to s.320.15 of the Criminal Code of Canada
- Judgment accordingly
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment