R. v. Bidesi
For first offences of contempt for refusing to testify at a murder trial the appropriate usual sentencing range is 15 months to three years; having weighed aggravating factors (seriousness of underlying charge, significant trial impact, leaving critical evidence unknown) against mitigating factors (youth, lack of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2016 BCSC 171
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Accused (underlying Murder/manslaughter): Russell Atma Bidesi; Contemnor/defendant: Joshua Bruno Martinez; Contemnor/defendant: Fabian Lyde
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 14 January 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Contempt Proceedings Arising From Criminal Trial / Sentencing (oral Reasons for Sentence)
- Outcome
- Both contemnors convicted of contempt of court and sentenced to 24 months' imprisonment each, consecutive to their current sentences
- Legal Topics
- Refusal to Testify, Murder Trial, Publication Ban, Gladue Factors, Consecutive Sentencing, Totality Principle
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
Russell Atma Bidesi
Accused (underlying Murder/manslaughter)
Joshua Bruno Martinez
Contemnor/defendant
Fabian Lyde
Contemnor/defendant
Procedural Posture
Contempt Proceedings Arising From Criminal Trial / Sentencing (oral Reasons for Sentence)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether refusal to testify by subpoenaed witnesses during a murder trial warrants significant custodial sentences for contempt
- 2 Appropriate sentencing range for first offences of contempt for refusal to testify in murder cases
- 3 Application of Gladue factors and totality principle when imposing consecutive contempt sentences
Ratio Decidendi
For first offences of contempt for refusing to testify at a murder trial the appropriate usual sentencing range is 15 months to three years; having weighed aggravating factors (seriousness of underlying charge, significant trial impact, leaving critical evidence unknown) against mitigating factors (youth, lack of prior record, rehabilitation efforts, Gladue factors and totality with existing manslaughter sentences), a fit sentence for each contemnor is 24 months' imprisonment to be served consecutively to their current sentences.
Court Disposition
Both contemnors convicted of contempt of court and sentenced to 24 months' imprisonment each, consecutive to their current sentences
Orders
- Each contemnor sentenced to 24 months' imprisonment for contempt of court to be served consecutively to the sentence currently being served
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment