In The Matter of the Estate of Jean Maureen Dahle, Deceased
Neither Tim nor Martin's conduct met the threshold for removal (no endangerment of trust property, no demonstrated want of honesty or incapacity); beneficiaries' welfare and efficient finalization of administration required appointment of a neutral professional third-party trust company as additional...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2021 BCSC 718
- Parties
- Deceased: Jean Maureen Dahle; Applicant / Co Executor and Co Trustee: Martin Dahle; Applicant / Co Executor and Co Trustee: Timothy (Tim) Dahle; Intervener / Interested Party: Public Guardian and Trustee of British Columbia
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 19 April 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Estate Administration / Will and Trust Applications / Application Hearing and Judgment on Removal of Co Executors and Appointment of Additional Executor/trustee (2021 BCSC 718)
- Outcome
- Applications to remove the other co-executor/co-trustee are dismissed; a professional third-party trust company to be added as co-executor and co-trustee of the estate
- Legal Topics
- Removal of Executor, Appointment of Trustee, Fiduciary Duties, Inherent Jurisdiction, Costs
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jean Maureen Dahle
Deceased
Martin Dahle
Applicant / Co Executor and Co Trustee
Timothy (Tim) Dahle
Applicant / Co Executor and Co Trustee
Public Guardian and Trustee of British Columbia
Intervener / Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Estate Administration / Will and Trust Applications / Application Hearing and Judgment on Removal of Co Executors and Appointment of Additional Executor/trustee (2021 BCSC 718)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether either co-executor/co-trustee (Tim or Martin) should be removed under WESA s.158
- 2 Whether the Court should appoint an additional executor/trustee under Trustee Act s.31 or inherent jurisdiction
- 3 Whether the conduct of either co-executor endangered trust property or showed want of honesty, capacity or fidelity
Ratio Decidendi
Neither Tim nor Martin's conduct met the threshold for removal (no endangerment of trust property, no demonstrated want of honesty or incapacity); beneficiaries' welfare and efficient finalization of administration required appointment of a neutral professional third-party trust company as additional co-executor/co-trustee with majority decision-making power, including ability of the professional trustee to decide alone when necessary.
Court Disposition
Applications to remove the other co-executor/co-trustee are dismissed; a professional third-party trust company to be added as co-executor and co-trustee of the estate
Orders
- Applications by Tim and Martin to remove the other as executor and trustee dismissed
- Appoint a professional third-party trust company as additional co-executor and co-trustee of the estate
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment